No tagging in a book

Milkman

In Ashamed of the Gospel by MacArthur all the tags are not "active" except for Scripture references. I can hover over or click the foot note and it does show, but it will not take you to that reference.

Also, on page 197 the first footnote to appear is empty or doesn't show when you hover over it. That's an important footnote for the rest of the footnotes are all Ibids.

Fortunately I have a hard copy of the book and can refer to it, but we all know how nice and easy it is to have the Logos product working properly.

mm.

JT (alabama24)

Milkman said:

I can hover over or click the foot note and it does show, but it will not take you to that reference.

Do you mean a scripture reference? 

Simon’s Brother

Confirming the footnote shows up blank

What I do note is the file is relatively old appearing to have not been updated since 2012. Logos 5 was released Nov 2012.It does say it is published by Crossway but I think it was originally a Thomas Nelson book as it was first published in 1993 and i would not be surprised if this book originally came to Logos via a Thomas Nelson MacArthur LLS collection and so file was originally built by Thomas Nelson rather than Logos and over the years it’s mainly had file format conversions and so originally either TN did not code all of these links or somewhere along the line in a format conversion the links have been broken for whatever reason. Not sure if I have my original LLS 2.0 disk to confirm this origin story.

But we’ll have to wait and see what FL comes back with in regards to the file.

JT (alabama24)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069317#Comment_1069317

DIsciple II said:

I think it was originally a Thomas Nelson book as it was first published in 1993 and i would not be surprised if this book originally came to Logos via a Thomas Nelson MacArthur LLS collection and so file was originally built by Thomas Nelson rather than Logos

That is likely the case. 

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069318#Comment_1069318

This has a unique production history and is already in our queue to get typos fixed.