So I got in on this when it was on prepub. I am somewhat disappointed that the expositions are not showing up in the passage guide (?).
Is this on purpose? Will it be updated?
Also hoping that this is simply an oversight and these will show up alongside the older translations: Exp. of the Book of Psalms I-VI and the two volumes from the ACW series.
Another note, the second volume of the Expositions of the Psalms (33-50) is tagged as "Sermons", while the other five volumes are marked as "Commentary".
Also hoping that this is simply an oversight and these will show up alongside the older translations: Exp. of the Book of Psalms I-VI and the two volumes from the ACW series. Another note, the second volume of the Expositions of the Psalms (33-50) is tagged as "Sermons", while the other five volumes are marked as "Commentary".
Agreed, I am surprised that no Faithlife employee has addressed this yet. $999.00 is a lot of money to put out.........
So I got in on this when it was on prepub. I am somewhat disappointed that the expositions are not showing up in the passage guide (?). Is this on purpose? Will it be updated?
We mis-catagorized a few titles and they've now been fixed. All of the Expositions on the Psalms are classified as Sermons now.
Because they're sermons, the Expositions of the Psalms, Sermons, and the two collections of homiles on 1 John and John should appear in the Passage Guide under Sermons. The caveat being that the reference range for the homily needs to be explicitly identified in the text. This means Psalms, 1 John, and John will have much greater coverage.
As I walked through the titles I found some borderline cases that I think would be better served by adding references to make them appear in the Passage Guide under Sermons but overall they're small in number.
Is there a reason expositions like Psalms are in "Sermons" as opposed to commentaries? For instance in "Early Church Fathers (Protestant Edition)" his works show up in commentaries.......This seems to be a much better arrangement.
This seems to be a much better arrangement.
I have consistently argued that the ECF is wrong in treating sermons as commentaries as it skews studying the history of sermons.
