Why the Repeated, Sequential Indexing?

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069903#Comment_1069903

A consequence of a large library is more frequent updates. [:s] Make sure to turn automatic downloads off. This will allow you to download and index less often.

Doc B

turn automatic downloads off. This will allow you to download and index less often

No, not really. It still indexes multiple times when I run the downloads. That's my primary question: Why doesn't it download and then index one time?

It didn't used to do this, at least not most of the time. And occasionally, it doesn't now, but it does most of the time.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069905#Comment_1069905

I feel your pain. I have 30,000+ resources in my library. I rarely use Logos anymore it is so bogged down. And that's not even when it's Indexing. It's just SLOW. Can't even switch to it and start typing something in the Library filter box without waiting 5-10 seconds for it to "wake up" and start accepting input. And every time I open the app if I happened to have had a Search tab open the last time I shut it down, it has to go and redo that search which I don't care about anymore, which can't be interrupted. Ditto for Guide tabs. I've always complained that old Search & Guide tabs should *not* rerun by default when the app is reopened, but should require the user to ask for them to be rerun if the user wants that, which I'd guess would be < 5% of the time.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069907#Comment_1069907

And every time I open the app if I happened to have had a Search tab open the last time I shut it down, it has to go and redo that search which I don't care about anymore, which can't be interrupted. Ditto for Guide tabs. I've always complained that old Search & Guide tabs should *not* rerun by default when the app is reopened, but should require the user to ask for them to be rerun if the user wants that, which I'd guess would be < 5% of the time.

+1 [Y] along with New Search tab repeating last search, which wastes more time since did not need last search run again before doing a New search (would be OK with last search appearing in New tab, but needing user to click arrow to run it). If had wanted to rerun previous Search, would have chosen "Duplicate This Panel"

FYI: before closing Logos for an application upgrade, personal quirk is closing search & guide tabs.

Keep Smiling [:)]

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069905#Comment_1069905

Why doesn't it download and then index one time?

I think it does. I think however, that you likely had a software update too. When that happens, there are several moving parts.

Dave Hooton

Just about every time I open L8 now, I have to wait for indexing to finish. And again. And again.

Part of the solution is not to close Logos i.e. keep it open until a restart is requested (along with turning off Auto Start Downloads).

The the next dependency is the resources that are in your layout and the datasets you have used, because a restart will be required if they are being updated. There is not much you can do about that, apart from deliberately restarting Logos to a blank layout when a download is notified.

If indexing has started and a software update requires a restart, then don't do it until indexing has completed.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069905#Comment_1069905

Some of the responses you have got DOC B give me the impression people are not listening to your concerns but simply thinking ahead to the quick defence they can provide to basically say to you ‘suck it up, it is what it is’, just in a normal nicer sounding way.

I know exactly what you are talking about, this would still happen if you only ever updated manually. It’s not that you have to update, it’s that the architecture of the software and it’s update process that it requires multiple downloads, updates and restarts ( and user interventions) because multiple things are waiting in the queue at once instead of this queue being managed in the background and hidden from the user. As it stands your computer becomes unusable but you have to sit their and watch it, and press the button to go to the next step in the sequence, so you become unproductive too.

Bruce Dunning

Part of the solution is not to close Logos

It is interesting that you suggest this because this has been my strategy for some time.

But I also agree that the speed of starting Logos is an issue that needs to be improved.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069907#Comment_1069907

And every time I open the app if I happened to have had a Search tab open the last time I shut it down, it has to go and redo that search

This is counterbalanced by a reopen closed tab of a search remembering nothing of it's state when closed ... anyone remember when the counterbalance technology was used for cable cars on Queen Anne? but I digress . . .

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069937#Comment_1069937

Some of the responses you have got DOC B give me the impression people are not listening to your concerns but simply thinking ahead to the quick defence they can provide to basically say to you ‘suck it up, it is what it is’, just in a normal nicer sounding way.

Perhaps you thought I was one of the ones who was implying "suck it up" but I was not. I was heaping abuse on Logos for being so slow (in other areas as well). Essentially commiserating with the OP.

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

Sean

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069964#Comment_1069964

Perhaps you thought I was one of the ones who was implying "suck it up" but I was not. I was heaping abuse on Logos for being so slow (in other areas as well). Essentially commiserating with the OP.

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

I'm sure someone will be in any moment to explain that you just need to get an SSD in order to... Oh.

(I don't have an SSD, but I still refuse to accept that it's thus necessary for Logos to take a full 30 seconds to switch to the homepage from my current layout.)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069964#Comment_1069964

Rosie I did not read your response that way. You showed you had fully read DOC B’s concerns and identified with them.

I have a similar sized library to you so I know you get the pain. My machine is a couple of years old now and fairly basic spec. I will need to consider a new one next year with Logos 9 way expected and finally get a SSD. I know I’m late to that party but playing with hardware is not my thing so I don’t do DIY upgrades.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069969#Comment_1069969

I'm sure someone will be in any moment to explain that you just need to get an SSD in order to... Oh.

(I don't have an SSD, but I still refuse to accept that it's thus necessary for Logos to take a full 30 seconds to switch to the homepage from my current layout.)

If anyone suggests that not having a SSD causes this to take 30 secs clearly they have drunk the full carton of FL Kool Aid.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069937#Comment_1069937

Some of the responses you have got DOC B give me the impression people are not listening to your concerns but simply thinking ahead to the quick defence they can provide to basically say to you ‘suck it up, it is what it is’, just in a normal nicer sounding way.

The response that is needed has to come from Faithlife, and Rosie has complained about her situation over several years. Just as Libronix began to hit a wall when resources reached one thousand (or earlier), Logos is suffering with resources over nine thousand (or so). I have 2250, and no real issues with my strategy (above).

Unfortunately, Rosie and DocB may have to consider offloading resources to the "cloud" (or perform a fresh install with "Recommended" resources). They can at least Search their Library in the Cloud when necessary, or download resources when needed.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069982#Comment_1069982

Unfortunately, Rosie and DocB may have to consider offloading resources to the "cloud" (or perform a fresh install with "Recommended" resources). They can at least Search their Library in the Cloud when necessary, or download resources when needed.

Having the Text Creation Partnership, I have > 50,000 resources which have been divided between hidden and active for years. Now I split the active group between cloud and local. But that has no effect on my longest wait times ... building the pick lists ... My system would speedy up significantly if the app simply accepted what I typed rather than insisted I selected from the $#&&*^*& list which does a %^(^&(^&*( job of even offering the right option on a multipart name in Factbook. The initial loads are measured in minutes not seconds.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069982#Comment_1069982

Unfortunately, Rosie and DocB may have to consider offloading resources to the "cloud" (or perform a fresh install with "Recommended" resources). They can at least Search their Library in the Cloud when necessary, or download resources when needed.

Ugh. I've already long ago given up curating my library by tagging thoroughly and creating useful collections, after I hit about 200 of the latter, most of which were never completely accurate because I have so many resources. I just don't have time for all that library management. And now you're saying I also need to manage which resources I have locally on my machine and which ones are in the cloud? And wait to download a resource every time I want to open one that isn't one of the "Recommended" resources? Ugh.

I guess my enthusiasm about buying every resource that looked potentially interesting to me over the years ended up being my downfall.

I've spent $169,854.51 on my Logos Library over nearly 30 years. Feeling like I've spent about $150,000 too much. [:(]

David J Heintzman

I came here tonight out of frustration after attempting to install Logos on a new computer, and came across this thread. The thing will be indexing all night, and for now the computer is unusable. I can honestly say that I've never encountered another piece of software that behaves in this way. Even on a good day the software of late feels so sluggish at times. Something with such incredible capabilities should be a joy to use, but using Logos has become pretty joyless lately.

My experience tonight reminded me of a blog post Bob wrote way back in 2007, so I went looking for it and found it. It's entitled "When I Hit the Button, Do Something!" He wrote:

"Despite the increasing computational capacity of our devices, the problem seems to be getting worse. User interface responsiveness seems to lie low on the list of priorities in many contemporary electronic devices.

There’s not much I can add to Dennis Forbes’ post except “Amen!”.

Talk about irony! No other piece of software I own exemplifies this sentiment the way Logos does. It seems that "user interface responsiveness" is quite low on the priority list lately.

His post can be found here: http://bobpritchett.com/2007/08/when_i_hit_the_button_do_somet/

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069982#Comment_1069982

The response that is needed has to come from Faithlife

Never has a truer word been spoken on these forums.

We need to be open and honest with FL about this issues and their impact and not just explain them away on behalf of FL when somebody does raise a problem. FL need to feel the weight of user expectations, frustrations and disappointments otherwise management will continue to think everything is fine and dandy. And I am sure they don't want users who have reached 9,000 titles to all of a sudden stop buying resources because the software can't handle it.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

I started L8 about an hour ago, and I'm now in my third download/indexing cycle. It took me 7+ minutes just to get this forum thread posted, because of how slow the machine runs during indexing.

Sounds abnormal so curious about storage device ? Also curious if have contacted Faithlife Technical Support about download/index cycles ?

[:$] Mea culpa after reading Sean's reply about SSD. Description of 7+ minutes to get a forum thread posted sounds like a hard drive (so indexing adversely affects performance of other computer tasks as indexing reads & writes a lot to disk). Since migrating to SSD years ago had forgotten about hard drive bottleneck (hard drive can only read/write to one place on whole disk at a time while SSD can read/write many storage places simultaneously).

But that has no effect on my longest wait times ... building the pick lists ... My system would speedy up significantly if the app simply accepted what I typed rather than insisted I selected from the $#&&*^*& list which does a %^(^&(^&*( job of even offering the right option on a multipart name in Factbook.

Dreaming of customization options for automated assistance. For original languages, my preference is root and lemma (seldom search for specific conjugated form). Search suggestion annoyance is Large Text for ([field largetext] ...). Personally would rather turn off pick list assistance since does not help my Bible study (but rather slows down study that includes pick list appearing after search is in progress OR appear again after search - tab selection change OR resize window).

Unfortunately, Rosie and DocB may have to consider offloading resources to the "cloud" (or perform a fresh install with "Recommended" resources). They can at least Search their Library in the Cloud when necessary, or download resources when needed.

Another option is a big purchased library and a small demonstration library. Initially created a secondary Faithlife account for demonstration purposes. Demonstration account with $ 0.00 order total has Logos 7+8 Basic, Verbum 7+8 Basic, Home School, Logos 8 Fundamentals (Thankful for Logos 8 Upgrade including free Logos 7 Fundamentals gift so Logos 8 Fundamentals upgrade was $ 20 that was covered by a Faithlife coupon). Thankful can use Logos 8 & Verbum 8 at the same time. Demonstration account is often useful for forum questions and personal Bible study (smaller library of 466 resources with 112 in the cloud can be noticeably faster than larger library having 28,000+ resources). Demonstration account was also useful for migrating shared Faithlife documents (especially collections and visual filters) that were bogging down purchased library.

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCI-Express 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

I'm sorry for really tired of this (while wondering if Faithlife understands what is disappointing for daily use).

Keep Smiling [:)]

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069986#Comment_1069986

I just don't have time for all that library management. And now you're saying I also need to manage which resources I have locally on my machine and which ones are in the cloud?...

I understand your response because I wasn't "saying" there was a need to do that (I wrote "unfortunately" and "may"). Martha's response also showed it is not the answer. So, back to Faithlife!

For interests sake, how big is your Logos folder and how long does it take to index a few resources e.g. with an update?

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069991#Comment_1069991

Talk about irony! No other piece of software I own exemplifies this sentiment the way Logos does. It seems that "user interface responsiveness" is quite low on the priority list lately.

Library catalog refresh has automatic refresh of Library display, which annoying forgets which resource was selected (so trying to read resource information while catalog index or collection cache is rebuilt can cause user selection to vanish without any user action).

Concur with irony! as more recent Logos & Verbum releases automatically try to be more user helpful (while effectively being more of a hindrance to experienced power users).

Keep Smiling [:)]

Mattillo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069996#Comment_1069996

Yikes! I don't have nearly the amount of resources you all do but my surface pro 3 works great w/ Logos. The only multiple indexing I get is between resources and datasets. Some resources are slow to load I agree but I chalked that up to the age of my computer.

I hope you all get it figured out!

Thomas Ball

Hi Doc B

I'm going to contact you offline.

mab

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069994#Comment_1069994

I think the dribble downloading is something Logos should look into.

I've turned off auto download. I open to a blank screen. This saves gobs of time on any installation. If you open with a layout that has floating panels or searches, you will pay dearly in how fast it settles down to use.

I decided to update a machine with an SSD this past week. Apparently the machine was on it's last breath and died shortly after, so I have an SSD which will get transplanted somewhere else.

While it ran it was just fine, but frankly Logos is a pig, especially if you think you think you can run it on the standard presets with a big dowloaded layout and auto download.. You don't put the Alaskan Pipeline through a straw. I think even the optimum specs for Logos install hardware that FL publishes are conservative. I'm not exactly happy at the thought of buying an expensive machine, but Logos is demanding software if you have a large library.

I forget where the story originates, but if you don't have room for an elephant in your tent, don't make friends with the elephant trainer.

Francis

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069994#Comment_1069994

Not to downplay in any way the legitimate frustrations here... mine being -- like MJ's -- more with the autopopulate lists, but it also takes quite a long time for Windows to rebuild its search index and it's search is not even that effective in the end.

My question is whether the now defunct Bibleworks or the current Accordance offer a similar level of complexity to searches yet is able to do it with much better performance. If so, this could be indication that the number of resources and the depth of tagging is not the real problem. If not, then the question would remain how do we know that we can do much better beside wishing for it? I am not suggestive of an answer, but genuinely asking others what they know about this.

John Fidel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070140#Comment_1070140

Not to downplay in any way the legitimate frustrations here... mine being -- like MJ's -- more with the autopopulate lists, but it also takes quite a long time for Windows to rebuild its search index and it's search is not even that effective in the end.

My question is whether the now defunct Bibleworks or the current Accordance offer a similar level of complexity to searches yet is able to do it with much better performance. If so, this could be indication that the number of resources and the depth of tagging is not the real problem. If not, then the question would remain how do we know that we can do much better beside wishing for it? I am not suggestive of an answer, but genuinely asking others what they know about this.

Hi Francis,

BW, when it was operational, came with a fixed set of resources. It does not index, but searches do not search the entire library, only the primary texts. It defaults to only searching one text, but you can set it to search all texts with that language. In addition the morphological text is separate from the primary text, which means you search the morph text for lemmas. By having essentially a closed system, with little option to add resources, indexing is not required. You cannot search your entire library.

Accordance does not index. It does some very complex searches quickly, however, Accordance does not have the "data sets" for person, sense, topic, etc. that Logos has. It uses Strongs or the GK (NIV) #s for tying to their reverse interlinears. For many the speed of Accordance when working with the original languages and not using indexing is a strong selling point. Accordance does not offer 50K in resources for sale.

So really you have different products to some extent. Depending on your focus people choose which is best for them. Logos is a complex product with all the data sets they tie to their biblical texts, reverse interlinears tied to OL, etc. This requires indexing to allow for faster searches.

It is probably safe to say that Logos innovates and uses a ready .... shoot... aim process in their development. They release and fix later. This does not always allow for efficiency in how the program works. They have always been that way, but they also offer features that the others do not. Whether they re useful or usable, depends on the user. Not justifying anything, just stating my perception of how things work.

Hopefully the above is stated objectively and not intended to refute the requests for improvements of other on this thread. Who doesn't want the program to work faster and be less disruptive to workflows?

DAL

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069980#Comment_1069980

Rosie I did not read your response that way. You showed you had fully read DOC B’s concerns and identified with them.

I have a similar sized library to you so I know you get the pain. My machine is a couple of years old now and fairly basic spec. I will need to consider a new one next year with Logos 9 way expected and finally get a SSD. I know I’m late to that party but playing with hardware is not my thing so I don’t do DIY upgrades.

I only have half the size your library and Rosie’s and when it’s indexing it even affects my word document that I’m working on. So maybe I’ll just buy as needed and upgrade but maybe no more adding books to my library in future library upgrades because it really slows it down when it’s indexing. I think I have plenty for now. I’ll probably do one final library upgrade before Logos 9 and during L9, but we’ll see.

DAL

Linda

My library is indexing often as well. I don't have as many resources as some so it's not a big problem, but I also wondered why it's happening. I also have lost the sidebar/filters to my library which I posted in it's own thread, but wonder if somehow this is related??

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070208#Comment_1070208

I also have lost the sidebar/filters to my library which I posted in it's own thread, but wonder if somehow this is related??

It is unrelated. Has someone responded to your other thread? I'll see if I can find it.

Doc B

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069927#Comment_1069927

Part of the solution is not to close Logos i.e. keep it open until a restart is requested

Absolutely, unequivocally, insurmountably out of the question. Logos is too large a resource hog to leave open.

Doc B

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069993#Comment_1069993

The response that is needed has to come from Faithlife

Never has a truer word been spoken on these forums.

For those who are wondering, I *did* get a helpful email response from Tommy at FL with some instructions to trouble-shoot the issue. I very much appreciate the follow-up.

Problem is, they require me to put on a programmer's hat (that I do not own)...and some time (which I will find).

He seems to be concerned that the indexer is crashing (which I don't think it is based on getting finished indexing...just really slowly after repeated indexes) or that I don't have enough free disk drive space (which I clearly do...well over 300GB). When I get time, I'll collect the logs (he wants two iterations over two consecutive days) and we'll see.

I hate collecting logs.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070338#Comment_1070338

[:s] [:)]

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070338#Comment_1070338

For those who are wondering, I *did* get a helpful email response from Tommy at FL with some instructions to trouble-shoot the issue

Great to here.

He seems to be concerned that the indexer is crashing (which I don't think it is based on getting finished indexing...just really slowly after repeated indexes) or that I don't have enough free disk drive space (which I clearly do...well over 300GB).

This is the stock standard solution but to me it says true issue you are raising is not being heard if they believe this will fix the situation … but sometimes you got to go through the steps logically to get people to understand the true issue.

Andrew Batishko

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070390#Comment_1070390

This is the stock standard solution but to me it says true issue you are raising is not being heard if they believe this will fix the situation … but sometimes you got to go through the steps logically to get people to understand the true issue.

It means that we aren't aware of any situations that would lead to indexing occurring more often than every two weeks (which is how often resource updates get published), with the following expected exceptions:

When a batch of resources is updated, and some require an application restart (or an application update requires a restart), then indexing may begin before the restart occurs. After the restart, indexing will need to run again for any resources that got updated after the restart. This should only happen once.
When you download a newly purchased resource, indexing on the new resources must happen.
When you download a resource that was previously a cloud resource (or a hidden resource), then indexing must happen.

It doesn't sound like Doc B is encountering any of those situations, so we have to investigate to find out why he is experiencing a problem that we can't recreate for ourselves. Doing that requires verifying known situations that can cause the symptoms (indexer crashing or out of disk space) and collecting log files to look for traces of the problem there.

If we're missing some kind of systemic problem with how updating occurs, we'd love for you to help us determine the cause of this problem so that we can fix it.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070396#Comment_1070396

The systematic problem was described earlier in regards to multipart updates requiring user intervention and thus they can‘t go a do something for else productive while the update process does what it needs to do and you can’t rely on overnight updates because of the require user intervention.

Appreciate you taking the time to ask Andrew. Hopefully I explained the issue well enough.

This is the stock standard solution but to me it says true issue you are raising is not being heard if they believe this will fix the situation … but sometimes you got to go through the steps logically to get people to understand the true issue.

It means that we aren't aware of any situations that would lead to indexing occurring more often than every two weeks (which is how often resource updates get published), with the following expected exceptions:

When a batch of resources is updated, and some require an application restart (or an application update requires a restart), then indexing may begin before the restart occurs. After the restart, indexing will need to run again for any resources that got updated after the restart. This should only happen once.

When you download a newly purchased resource, indexing on the new resources must happen.

When you download a resource that was previously a cloud resource (or a hidden resource), then indexing must happen.

It doesn't sound like Doc B is encountering any of those situations, so we have to investigate to find out why he is experiencing a problem that we can't recreate for ourselves. Doing that requires verifying known situations that can cause the symptoms (indexer crashing or out of disk space) and collecting log files to look for traces of the problem there.

If we're missing some kind of systemic problem with how updating occurs, we'd love for you to help us determine the cause of this problem so that we can fix it.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070338#Comment_1070338

He seems to be concerned that the indexer is crashing (which I don't think it is based on getting finished indexing...just really slowly after repeated indexes) or that I don't have enough free disk drive space (which I clearly do...well over 300GB). When I get time, I'll collect the logs (he wants two iterations over two consecutive days) and we'll see.

Years ago with a similar problem Bradley diagnosed a dying hard drive ... I would have preferred a software bug [;)]

Andrew Batishko

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1070413#Comment_1070413

The systematic problem was described earlier in regards to multipart updates requiring user intervention and thus they can‘t go a do something for else productive while the update process does what it needs to do and you can’t rely on overnight updates because of the require user intervention.

That sounds like a nice enough idea, but not one that directly solves Doc B's problem.

mab

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1069964#Comment_1069964

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

Thought I now could add my two cents on this. I just got a Dell XPS 15 with an i9 8th Gen CPU 32GB RAM 2666, 4GB Graphics, and a 1 TB Pci-e SSD. (It was on sale--maybe to make room for 9th Gen ) I've only got a bit over 15,000 resources, but it downloaded everything and indexed it all really fast. I was going to wait for the new MacBook Pro 16, but this basically about the same config in a Win 10 box. Logos loads and I can get right to work. I even used it while it was indexing, something that was a real struggle before.

I'd hate to think Logos needs this kind of artillery, but it doesn't matter. It works. I have some other needs for this beast, so it will all get used.

Kevin A

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1072433#Comment_1072433

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

Rosie your machine should be crazy fast. I know when Logos first launches a bible it has to apply all the Visual Filters, and this can be very slow, and can take several minutes if many filters present, or many bibles versions being opened that have the filter applied, as it has to apply it to each version.

However once it completes this process, the cpu should return to normal. Do you have lots of visual filters?

NB -

1) If all of that bible version is closed, and reopend, it has to go through this process again.

2) Even if the VF is unticked in the bible, it still has to go through this process. I create a collection called 'VF Applied" and then apply the Visual Filter to the Collection, I can then just add and remove my bible to the collection I want to see or not see the Visual Filters. This means when the usual bible is not in the collection, I do not have to wait for the filters to be applied, if I just unticked them, I would have to wait.

Anyway you may have explored this somewhere in your many other posts, but it may be helpful for others if they have having problems.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1072445#Comment_1072445

I just brought a brand new laptop, asked for one with sizzling fast specs (https://www.msi.com/Laptop/GS65-Stealth-Thin-8RF), and had them upgrade it to 32GB of super-fast RAM (G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM) and a 2TB SSD (WD Black SN750 2TB PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 Read:3400Mb/s,Write: 2900MB/s). Installed Logos fresh on it, let it download everything and complete indexing, and was disappointed already at the speed. Ugh. I'm really tired of this.

Rosie your machine should be crazy fast. I know when Logos first launches a bible it has to apply all the Visual Filters, and this can be very slow, and can take several minutes if many filters present, or many bibles versions being opened that have the filter applied, as it has to apply it to each version.

However once it completes this process, the cpu should return to normal. Do you have lots of visual filters?

Seems like this is an area that Faithlife should work on speeding up.

Yes, I do have lots of VFs. I've experimented a lot with them, so I probably have lots of leftover test ones that I don't need anymore, and I could delete those. That might help.

When I open the VF menu in my Preferred Bible, I see the following sections, with these numbers of checkboxes in each one:

RESOURCE - 5 (It looks like this is a fixed number and I can't reduce it.)

COMMUNITY NOTES - 11 (I'm guessing this is because of all the FL groups I'm a member of and the only way to reduce this number is to leave the groups?)

MEDIA - 3 (It looks like this is a fixed number.)

NOTES AND HIGHLIGHTS - 8 (I'm guessing this is all the notebooks I have which cover Bible texts; I could probably reduce these)

PASSAGE LISTS - 13 (I could get rid of most of these; most of them were experiments or for short term usage)

READING PLANS - 5 (I don't use reading plans anymore; I could probably get rid of all but one of these)

VISUAL FILTERS - 3 (These were all experiments)

But seriously, if this product is supposed to be able to accommodate power users, it doesn't seem too much to ask that it not slow down appreciably when you have a handful of notes an passage lists and reading plans and VFs and are a member of several FL groups.

1) If all of that bible version is closed, and reopend, it has to go through this process again.

What a pain. Can't it cache that information?