BUG - Lexham Hebrew Bible - "corresponding words" issue

In the Lexham Hebrew Bible, with the "corresponding words" filter set to "same lemma" or "same root" -- when I click on any word that has a prefixed lamedh preposition, ALL words with the lamedh preposition are highlighted. I would like to see all occurrences of the OBJECT of the preposition, not of the preposition itself.

I haven't come across any other prefixes that work like this in the LHB, and I haven't yet found any other Hebrew Bibles that have this issue.

In this screenshot, I was trying to find other occurrences of NZR and clicked on the word highlighted in yellow:

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

MJ. Smith

bump this issue

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1085831#Comment_1085831

rebump

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1088193#Comment_1088193

Okay - I asked that this be moved as two bumps and a message from another MVP did not get it noticed in the "General" forum. I have a whole week to plan the next escalation ... devious but not malicious I should think.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089038#Comment_1089038

MJ, I appreciate your keeping this issue alive.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089038#Comment_1089038

Try the Lexham forum: https://community.logos.com/forums/126.aspx

Philana R. Crouch

What you are asking for is the grammatical function, that's not how "corresponding selection" works. The preposition is the lemma.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089183#Comment_1089183

Thank you, Philana, for jumping in. However, the lamedh prefixed-preposition is the only one I have found that works this way. See the image attached, where a beth prefixed-preposition word is highlighted, but the filter doesn't "light up" another beth prefixed word a few lines down.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089191#Comment_1089191

Here's another example, where I clicked on the BDRK in the previous example, and other words with DRK lemma or root are highlighted.

Philana R. Crouch

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089191#Comment_1089191

Thank you, Philana, for jumping in. However, the lamedh prefixed-preposition is the only one I have found that works this way. See the image attached, where a beth prefixed-preposition word is highlighted, but the filter doesn't "light up" another beth prefixed word a few lines down.

So if there is more than one lemma it won't prefer the prefix since it's two lemmas.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089193#Comment_1089193

I think the beth prefix preposition works the way you describe, but the lamedh does not. In my first example at the top of this thread, the word I had clicked on to trigger the filter was lamedh preposition+noun -- and all the other lamedh prepositions lit up, i.e., the prefix was preferred for this preposition. The lamedh preposition creates a Bug-ish behavior, I think.

Philana R. Crouch

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089196#Comment_1089196

I think the beth prefix preposition works the way you describe, but the lamedh does not. In my first example at the top of this thread, the word I had clicked on to trigger the filter was lamedh preposition+noun -- and all the other lamedh prepositions lit up, i.e., the prefix was preferred for this preposition. The lamedh preposition creates a Bug-ish behavior, I think.

Hi Mary-Ellen,

I think you might be right. I'll write up a case.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1089215#Comment_1089215

Thank you, Philana, for your close attention to detail!