I'm pretty sure I made this suggestion a few years back, but I'm bumping the idea here. I'm speaking for myself, but I think this idea makes a ton of sense. I know that the hyperlinked references and citations in Logos is one of the primary reasons I have a library as large as I do. I don't ever expect to actually read all the books in my library, but when I am researching a topic, I want to follow as many of the citations and references as possible. With this in mind, and since I'm sure others feel the same, I think FL should make a deliberate effort to determine which resources are most often referenced in the Logos system and begin acquiring those resources. I'm just spitballing, but I would suggest that FL add the top 200-500 most frequently ref'd/cited resources to Logos. That would maximize the utility of Logos more than any other acquisitions. Please set this as a goal.
Also, it occurs to me that this project could conceivably give certain publishers the nudge they need to commit to Logos. I know that some journal publishers are committed to the status quo--i.e. JSTOR & their ilk--but JSTOR is positively Neanderthal as far as I'm concerned. Why? Because it doesn't link to my Logos library--it's a MASSIVE CHORE TO ACCESS and an absurd waste of time. If FL could show journal publishers, et al., that there is a giant ready made and motivated purchasing audience based on the references & citations currently in the Logos platform, it might tip the scale in Logos's favor. I will spend thousands for access to these resources in Logos; I won't spend a penny to access through JSTOR or their like.
