How does Logos and its many tools compare with Roam Research?

Anyone have any comparison for using Roam Research for Bible Study vs Logos? Seems like Logos does a lot of what Roam does...

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Ryland Brown

I've never heard of Roam until you mentioned it. After checking it out, I think if one wants to use Logos as an app for Bible study then it works great. Roam seems to be geared more toward all aspects of life. I use Evernote as my main note taking app but keep all of my Bible study, sermon prep, etc. notes in Logos.

Bill Cook

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1110961#Comment_1110961

Well, I had read a post https://thesweetsetup.com/how-im-using-roam-research-for-bible-study/ on The Sweet Setup how a writer uses Roam for Bible Study... seems interesting

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1110968#Comment_1110968

https://thesweetsetup.com/how-im-using-roam-research-for-bible-study/

That is an interesting article. It could help one develop some best practices for using Notes in Logos. In a strange way Roam Research reminds me of Houdini - the first hypertext note system. It seems to me that the main differences between Roam and Logos are:

Roam provides a graphic interface for its web ... something I would like to see in Logos even if just on its own datasets such as Biblical cross-references and commentary influences (references by author)
Most of the structure of Roam notes can be had via the disciplined use of Logos
Logos provides a vast base of texts and dataset which serve as a base for notes rather than having to import all such data into the notes.