NIV84 inline interlinear not showing up for me

The NIV84 inline reverse interlinear is not showing up in the new testament for me. The reverse interlinear pane does appear. I was reading Titus 2:4 and moused over the word love (their husbands), and my information panel reported love for NIV84, but reported periistemi (avoid) for my other english translations, so something was wrong there, since love their husbands does not mean avoid their husbands! I moused over the word children in that same verse, and the information panel reported gibberish "im, God" translation for NIV84, and the expected translation "children" for my other english translations. Wondering if just my NIV84 NT RI is corrupted?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Roy

Confirmed on Logos ver 8.17.0011 running on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave.

The inline RI does not appear however the RI pane will display.

Dan Francis

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123715#Comment_1123715

Confirmed on Logos ver 8.17.0011 running on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave.

The inline RI does not appear however the RI pane will display.

Functioning normally on Verbum ver 8.17.0011 running on macOS 10.15.6 Catalina.

-dan

Scott E. Mahle

No New Testament inline reverse interlinear on Windows 10 Pro version 10.0.19041 Build 19041 and Logos 8 version 8.17.0.0011.

Kristine Lewis

I notice in NIV84 2 Timothy 2:16, mousing over the word avoid (periistemi) shows it is translated as love by NIV84 according to the information panel, and mousing over the NIV84 word love (mis-identified in information panel as periistemi) in Titus 2:4 shows it as translated love in NIV84 in the information panel, and translated as avoid in my favorite bibles list in the information panel. Some confusion going on, maybe scrambling 2Ti and Ti2 in NIV84 reverse interlinear?

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123769#Comment_1123769

I notice in NIV84 2 Timothy 2:16, mousing over the word avoid (periistemi) shows it is translated as love by NIV84 according to the information panel, and mousing over the NIV84 word love (mis-identified in information panel as periistemi) in Titus 2:4 shows it as translated love in NIV84 in the information panel, and translated as avoid in my favorite bibles list in the information panel. Some confusion going on, maybe scrambling 2Ti and Ti2 in NIV84 reverse interlinear?

When you find bugs in the data, you need to start a new thread with DATA BUG in the heading to make sure that it is seen by the right people at Faithlife.

DominicM

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123769#Comment_1123769

Is your machine indexing? sometimes indexing causes weird display anomalies.. which go away after indexing

Mark Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123774#Comment_1123774

It does not show on my computer, either. OT is fine. NT is gone.

Bruce Dunning

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123777#Comment_1123777

It does not show on my computer, either. OT is fine. NT is gone.

Same here.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123808#Comment_1123808

It does not show on my computer, either. OT is fine. NT is gone.

Same here.

+1 and adding support info:

LLS:1.0.10
2020-09-22T20:53:50Z
NIV.logos4
RVI:NIVNT
2020-08-07T20:07:40Z
NIVNT.lbsrvi
RVI:NIVOT
2020-09-22T20:44:50Z
NIVOT.lbsrvi

maybe they changed something relevant in the Sept 22 release which leaves the Aug 7 RI out in the cold. Other RI bibles have surface text and RIs showing the same date (I checked NRSV, ESV and NIV 2011, the latter also being updated on Sept 22).

If we're lucky the updated NT RI dataset was produced but left behind in shipping the current version.

DominicM

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123836#Comment_1123836

yeah odd, my visual filters now aren't working after shutting logos down after yesterdays indexing, suspect its a 8.17 bug

Ted Harms

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123930#Comment_1123930

I also am experiencing all the problems mentioned above with the NIV 84 edition.

Rick Ausdahl

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123808#Comment_1123808

It does not show on my computer, either. OT is fine. NT is gone.

Same here.

I see the same. The RI bottom pane works properly in both OT & NT. Inline works for OT but is missing in NT.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124202#Comment_1124202

Rick Brannan has seen this and is working towards a fix.

Mark Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124205#Comment_1124205

It is now fixed. The dataset has downloaded to my computer.

Rick Brannan (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124286#Comment_1124286

It is now fixed. The dataset has downloaded to my computer.

Confirming that we (Faithlife) did ship an update to the 1984 NIV to address this issue.

Apologies for the slip up that caused it in the first place. We're looking at adding further checks to our publishing system to isolate this particular error and prevent it from happening again.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124294#Comment_1124294

Confirming that we (Faithlife) did ship an update to the 1984 NIV to address this issue.

Thanks Rick!

We now have the NIV 84 bible and RI's in sync:

LLS:1.0.10
2020-10-12T18:02:42Z
NIV.logos4
RVI:NIVNT
2020-10-12T17:53:41Z
NIVNT.lbsrvi
RVI:NIVOT
2020-10-12T17:53:41Z
NIVOT.lbsrvi

Bruce Dunning

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124301#Comment_1124301

Much appreciated. Thanks Rick.

Ted Harms

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124330#Comment_1124330

All is well and back to the usual. Thanks so much Faithlife.

Dan Francis

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1123738#Comment_1123738

Confirmed on Logos ver 8.17.0011 running on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave.

The inline RI does not appear however the RI pane will display.

Functioning normally on Verbum ver 8.17.0011 running on macOS 10.15.6 Catalina.

-dan

MY BAD.... 2011 works normally, the bug is in my 1984 as well..

-dan

John R. Gentry

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124613#Comment_1124613

My OT and NT NIV84 interlinears are working fine after this morning's update. However, I noticed there is an inconsistency with how the OT NIV84 interlinear is labeled. Following the other interlinears, I would expect to see “NIV OT RI” and not “RVI:NIVOT.” Not sure if this is important or not, but thought I'd mention it just in case.

John

John R. Gentry

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124613#Comment_1124613

[I apologize if this post duplicates. There was an error when I attempted to post it the first time.]

My interlinear for both OT and NT in the NIV84 are working just fine after this morning's update. However, I noticed an inconsistency with how the OT NIV84 was labeled. I would expect to see NIV OT RI instead of RVI:NIVOT. Not sure if this is important or not, but thought I'd mention it just in case.

John

John R. Gentry

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124613#Comment_1124613

[I apologize if this post duplicates. There was an error when I attempted to post it the first time.]

John

Rick Brannan (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1124632#Comment_1124632

Thanks John.

I've adjusted the metadata on our servers so this should hopefully be resolved for now.