Verbum Tip 4ay: (Non)Facet: Andersen-Forbes data -- syntax, morphology, genre, semantic domain, sour

MJ. Smith
MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 53,851
edited November 2024 in English Forum

Docx files for personal book: Verbum 9 part 1; Verbum 9 part 2; How to use the Verbum Lectionary and Missal; Verbum 8 tips 1-30; Verbum 8 tips 31-49

Please be generous with your additional details, corrections, suggestions, and other feedback. This is being built in a .docx file for a PBB which will be shared periodically.

Previous post: Verbum Tip 4ax Next post: Verbum Tip 4az

(Non)Facet: Andersen-Forbes data -- syntax, morphology, genre, semantic domain, source criticism

Andersen-Forbes historically was critical to Faithlife processing. This means that long-term users may revert to Andersen-Forbes when researching thorny syntax or tagging.

Dataset

  • DB:SYNTAX-AFAT AndersenForbesHebrewOT.lbssyn
  • DB:GRAMMAR-AF-ARC grammar-af-arc.lbsgrm
  • DB:GRAMMAR-AF-HE grammar-af-he.lbsgrm

 

Documentation

Data

  • <AndersenForbesGenre = name>
  • <EissfeldtHexateuch = name>
  • <AndersenForbesSemanticDomain = name>
  • <AndersenForbesPhraseMarkerAnalysis = name>
  • <AFMorphHeb ~ morph code>

New data provided by the label

This is not a label. However, all of the Andersen-Forbes data is original.

Filters

The wiki has several example visual filters based on Andersen-Forbes. An excerpt of the Eissenfeldt source criticism visual filter.

An excerpt of the Mowinkel source criticism visual filter:

An excerpt of the AFAT genre coding:

I do not have an example of a visual filter based on the AFAT semantic domains.

Vocabulary cards

none

Bible Browser

Not implemented

Faithlife Assistant

Not implemented

Interactive

None but there is a clause visualization.

Information Tool

Not available for clause visualization resources. I have a query in the forums to find why the Analyzed Text lacks the Andersen-Forbes coding in the Information Panel.

Context Menu

For genre:

The values shown in the context menu are listed at AFAT genres (logos.com).

The general pattern for Andersen-Forbes non-syntactic coding is that the copy reference and search options are available but the look up option does not as the standard glossary does not provide definitions for the non-syntactic coding.

For source criticism:

The Andersen-Forbes coding for source criticism – Eissfeldt and Mowinckel – are available at TIP of the day: datatypes for searching that are Andersen-Forbes specific - Faithlife Forums (logos.com)

The general pattern for Andersen-Forbes non-syntactic coding is that the copy reference and search options are available but the look up option does not as the standard glossary does not provide definitions for the non-syntactic coding.

The general pattern for Andersen-Forbes non-syntactic coding is that the copy reference and search options are available but the look up option does not as the standard glossary does not provide definitions for the non-syntactic coding.

For semantic domain:

Substantive Semantics in the Glossary documents the semantic domains for nouns.

The general pattern for Andersen-Forbes non-syntactic coding is that the copy reference and search options are available but the look up option does not as the standard glossary does not provide definitions for the non-syntactic coding.

Verbal Semantics/Valency in the Glossary documents the semantic domains for verbs.

The general pattern for Andersen-Forbes non-syntactic coding is that the copy reference and search options are available but the look up option does not as the standard glossary does not provide definitions for the non-syntactic coding.

For syntactic analysis:

The phrase markers follow the set pattern. I have entered a bug report for the failure of the Look up function to reference the glossary.

When accessing the Context Menu from the manuscript column:

Note that Manuscript is not separated from Selection. Otherwise, this Context Menu is as expected.

When accessing the Context Menu from the lexeme column:

The lemma generates standard copy reference and search as well as the full top five look up options.

When accessing the Context Menu from the gloss column:

Like Manuscript, Gloss is not separated from selection. It generates minimal copy and search functions as one would expect from a gloss.

When accessing the Context Menu from the morphology column:

There is no lookup to translate the morphology code although it is visible to the right of the morphology entry on the tab side and in the heading of the right (action) side. Standard copy and search functions are offered.

For morphology coding (in Analyzed Text):

This option is being considered because the added search options need exploration. Note the seven options for initiating a search. Inline, Bible, All Open, and All Resources are familiar.

The first option generates a search argument of <AFMorphHeb ~ VqAsSM3??> run as a Morphology Search against the AFAT.

The final entry adds the lemma to the morphological coding generating a search argument of lemma:היה:1@VqAsSM3 which produces the results:

Sorry but I have not found an example for the series option.

Concordance

These are not labels and therefore do not appear in the concordance.

Search

For genre:

Search argument: <AndersenForbesGenre = div-oth> yields

For source criticism:

Genesis: search argument <EissfeldtHexateuch = P> generates

Jeremiah: search argument <EissfeldtHexateuch = C> generates

The system is misbehaving on this and has been reported as a bug.

For semantic domain:

Noun: search argument <AndersenForbesSemanticDomain = vocbl> generates

Verb: for search argument <AndersenForbesSemanticDomain = exist> the following results

For syntactic analysis:

The generated search argument <AndersenForbesPhraseMarkerAnalysis = mnr : gram> returns no results.

For morphology coding:

The argument <AFMorphHeb = NPHSMN> generates the results

 

Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

Tagged:

Categories