BUGS: Visualizations Guide for Deuterocanonicals

Bauserman, Charles R., Matt Nerdahl, and Jimmy Parks. 2015. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the Septuagint Deuterocanon and Apocrypha. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press. is not listed in the results when I run the Visualization Guide on Gen-Rev with NRSV as the preferred bible.

In fact, if I run the Guide on Tobit alone, I get no results. I believe this to be wrong. Bauserman, Charles R., Matt Nerdahl, and Jimmy Parks. 2015. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the Septuagint Deuterocanon and Apocrypha. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press. should be included.

You might also want to correct the NT entries that do not extend to Revelation ...

And you might want to correct the spelling of the 3rd from the end entry .. an extra c is not necessary.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Sean Boisen

<snip/>

And you might want to correct the spelling of the 3rd from the end entry .. an extra c is not necessary.

MJ, this misspelling is puzzling: here's what i get for what i think is comparable (Logos Bible Software 9.2 Beta 3). Is it possible you've edited the abbreviation for this? What do you see on the Information panel for this resource?

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147176#Comment_1147176

Isaiah Hoogendyk (Faithlife)

Why are there seeming duplicates of titles, including the 4x Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament, and the *Casccadia titles?

What is revealed when you hover over the "Casccadia" titles?

Andrew Batishko

And you might want to correct the spelling of the 3rd from the end entry .. an extra c is not necessary.

Have you edited the series?

Isaiah Hoogendyk (Faithlife)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147569#Comment_1147569

Yeah, that's probably it.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147567#Comment_1147567

Why are there seeming duplicates of titles, including the 4x Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament, and the *Casccadia titles?

The 4 Lexham titles are 4 resources for me: LSGNT type:bible, LSGNT: Sentence Analysis type:clause-visualization, one NA and one SBL edition each

The two Cascadia ones (I don't see the typo), both type:clause-visualization again are one NA, one SBL.

The third one for the deuterocanon is missing in the display for me, too (which seems to be the actual bug) - and I'd like to see the LXX standard canon....

Edit: with all empty series, this is how it looks for me:

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147569#Comment_1147569

Have you edited the series?

Bingo, Andrew. Side effect of the new "title" routine ... another quirk to watch out for/get used to. Thanks.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147586#Comment_1147586

The third one for the deuterocanon is missing in the display for me, too (which seems to be the actual bug)

Let's return to the actual bug. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the Septuagint Deuterocanon and Apocrypha does not appear in results when the passage is Esther or Tobit.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1147625#Comment_1147625

The third one for the deuterocanon is missing in the display for me, too (which seems to be the actual bug)

Let's return to the actual bug. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the Septuagint Deuterocanon and Apocrypha does not appear in results when the passage is Esther or Tobit.

Hm, I didn't think of checking Greek Esther. But you sound like the other deuterocanonical books work? I tried Judith and Wisdom without success.