Is this actually what Logos wants as the FL sponsored application topic groups? How do they differ?
Yeap. Definitely some redundancy there, as they all appear to have been created by FL.
Sorry for the confusion. The second group is one we routinely create for feedback when we ship dataset documentation (in this case, https://ref.ly/logosres/cidbdocbiblex) to facilitate communication around the dataset and its documentation. We've recently added groups for all Logos tools, which probably explains either the first or third group, but clearly one (and maybe two) of these are redundant.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
