Help Needed on Syntax Graphs

What are the advantages or disadvantages of using the OpenText Syntax graphs over the Cascadia Syntax Graphs or vice-versa.

It is mainly a difference in terminology used or is the difference deeper than that?

Trying to decide which is the best one to use.

Thanks for any help and insight you can give.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Bruce Dunning

Good question Kenneth. I have used both and would love to see a comparison of the features of them both side by side.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

It is mainly a difference in terminology used or is the difference deeper than that?

Searching Logos Blog for Greek Syntax => https://blog.logos.com/?s=Greek+Syntax finds a number of articles, including:

Cascadia 18 June 2010 => https://blog.logos.com/taking_greek_syntax_beyond_the_new_testament/

OpenText.org 20 Oct 2005 => https://blog.logos.com/greek_syntax_op/

OpenText.org 2 Feb 2006 => https://blog.logos.com/greek_syntax_opentextorg_claus/

SBLGNT 10 May 2017 => https://blog.logos.com/pastors-use-different-greek-text/ with earlier thread => SBL Greek New Testament: What's Next?

Good question Kenneth. I have used both and would love to see a comparison of the features of them both side by side.

Thread => Subject of a sentence/verse has screen shots of both being used plus more.

Thread => Biblia Hebraica transcripta (BHt, aka "Richter Morphology"): Pending Release describes a relative new Hebrew syntax resource.

Keep Smiling [:)]

MJ. Smith

The fundamental difference is that Cascadia is machine produced using common terminology while OpenText has more human and linguistic attention. Both are solid starting points for research; both require that you also use your own brain.