BUG: To the data wranglers ... hymns as concepts?

I don't know when these got added but

Veni, Veni, Emmanuel
Veni Sancte Spiritus
Veni Creator
Victinae Pashali

These (and many others are hymns/sequences labeled "concepts" in Factbook ... which makes Factbook look at bit unreliable. Is it useful for us to provides lists of such errors caused by the automatic generation of records or are we to rest assured that they will be addressed shortly without our intervention?

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Mike Binks

Is it useful for us to provides lists of such errors caused by the automatic generation of records

Even if it is not useful to the Developers MJ, it is useful for us fellow travellers.

At least when we are affronted by the anomaly there is a chance that our memories will be prompted as to why.

Thank you.

Sean Boisen

Veni, Veni, Emmanuel

This is based on an article about this hymn in the ODCC: it's not the hymn itself, but a bundle of reference content about it. So i stand by calling it a concept, which is how we label LCV records.

I agree that the category of the subject of the content is "hymn": we haven't generally captured that level of information, except where reference works make it explicit (some sources label Person, Place, etc.), or where we've collected a set of items (like All the Prayers) with a common type.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1157407#Comment_1157407

This is based on an article about this hymn in the ODCC: it's not the hymn itself, but a bundle of reference content about it. So i stand by calling it a concept, which is how we label LCV records.

I understand the logic but I predict this will be problematic with a significant number of users. We'll wait and see.