KYLE: Aren't these essentially dataset documentation?

It seems to me that these ought to be type:Manual rather than Monograph as they are basically documentation for the interactives:

Brannan, Rick, ed. Manuscripts of the Septuagint. Manuscripts of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020.
Brannan, Rick, ed. Manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible. Manuscripts of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020.
Brannan, Rick, ed. Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament. Manuscripts of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Rick Brannan (Logos)

These are not manuals. They are not "basically documentation for the interactives."

I agree that "monograph" isn't fully descriptive of their nature, but it is the best available option.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1166974#Comment_1166974

They are not "basically documentation for the interactives."

I note that the word "interactive" doesn't even appear in an Inline Search of Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1166974#Comment_1166974

These are not manuals. They are not "basically documentation for the interactives."

Well, I'm going to put them in my Training and Documentation collection anyway. [:P] -- in the company of Louw-Nida and Andersen-Forbes Hebrew Grammar Visualized ... they are all things I want in the same search bucket. Yes, I do understand your point but ...

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1166974#Comment_1166974

I agree that "monograph" isn't fully descriptive of their nature, but it is the best available option.

They are close to the Ancient Manuscript type but they should have a Subject e.g. N.T.--Greek--Manuscripts, O.T.--Greek--Manuscripts, O.T.--Hebrew--Manuscripts