Data issue: Commentaries that should be:

MJ. Smith · 2021-07-19T01:13:00+00:00

These should be Catholic: * Wansbrough, Henry, ed. The New Jerusalem Bible. New York; London; Toronto; Sydney; Auckland: Doubleday, 1990. * Senior, Donald, John J. Collins, and Mary Ann Getty, eds. The Catholic Study Bible, 2nd Ed.: Notes. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. This should be Pentecostal: *…

MJ. Smith

These should be Catholic:

Wansbrough, Henry, ed. The New Jerusalem Bible. New York; London; Toronto; Sydney; Auckland: Doubleday, 1990.
Senior, Donald, John J. Collins, and Mary Ann Getty, eds. The Catholic Study Bible, 2nd Ed.: Notes. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

This should be Pentecostal:

Hayford, Jack W., ed. Spirit Filled Life Study Bible. Electronic ed. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1997.

These should be Lutheran

Roehrs, Walter H., and Martin H. Franzmann. Concordia Self-Study Commentary. Electronic ed. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1998.
Hoeber, Robert G. Concordia Self-Study Bible. Electronic ed. St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House, 1997.
Aymer, Margaret, Cynthia Briggs Kittredge, and David A. Sánchez, eds. The New Testament. Fortress Commentary on the Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2014.

This should be Baptist

Criswell, W. A., Paige Patterson, E. Ray Clendenen, Daniel L. Akin, Mallory Chamberlin, Dorothy Kelley Patterson, and Jack Pogue, eds. Believer’s Study Bible. Electronic ed. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991.

This should be Plymouth Brethren

MacDonald, William. Believer’s Bible Commentary: Old and New Testaments. Edited by Arthur Farstad. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1995.

This should be Patristic (by date)

Skeat, Walter W., ed. The Gospel of Saint Mark in Gothic: Introduction & Notes. Clarendon Press Series. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1882.

This should be Anglican - tied to morning/evening prayer of BCP

The Church Pulpit Commentary: St. Mark–St. Luke 7. London: J. Nisbet & Co., 1908.

This should be Messianic Judaism:

Rubin, Barry, ed. The Complete Jewish Study Bible: Notes. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Bibles; Messianic Jewish Publishers & Resources, 2016.

This should be modern Eastern Orthodoxy:

Sparks, Jack Norman. The Orthodox Study Bible: Notes. Thomas Nelson, 2008.

These should be Homiletic:

Parker, Joseph. Mark-John. Vol. 21–22. Preaching through the Bible. Baker Publishing Group, 2018. AND OTHER VOLUMES
Sloyan, Gerard S. Preaching from the Lectionary: An Exegetical Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2003.

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Kyle G. Anderson

I'll take a look. Thanks.

Dave Hooton

I don't think Study Bibles should be treated as Commentaries, else you create a precedent for Bible Notes.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174685#Comment_1174685

I don't think Study Bibles should be treated as Commentaries

To the best of my knowledge, they always have been treated as commentaries. All of the titles for which I propose a category appeared in the Commentary Passage Guide Section as unclassified. Note that if one selects type as the sort, study bible is a heading.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174686#Comment_1174686

To the best of my knowledge, they always have been treated as commentaries

Not in the sense of assigning a Type

Note that if one selects type as the sort, study bible is a heading.

Study Bibles appear under that heading and Bible Notes appear under their heading (for Type). As for Denomination, that may not be clear for all Study Bibles/Bible Notes.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174697#Comment_1174697

To the best of my knowledge, they always have been treated as commentaries

Not in the sense of assigning a Type

I am not asking for any change in type ... I simply want them to appear in the right categories in the Commentaries Passage Guide section or, put another way, I want them to be treated in the same way the other Study Bibles are.

As for Denomination, that may not be clear for all Study Bibles/Bible Notes.

Quite true. I have not tried to classify all the unclassified resources, only those that I am confident that I know where they belong. For example, most Evangelical commentaries, the Tyndale Study Bible ... are items I did not mention in my post because I was certain what to do with them.

What titles did I suggest a classification that concerned you? I'll double check them.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174685#Comment_1174685

ou create a precedent for Bible Notes.

Faithlife has already done this if you explore the Commentaries Passage Guide section.

Now that I am back on feedbear see Commentaries that need denominational tags: | Faithlife for additional examples

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174702#Comment_1174702

To the best of my knowledge, they always have been treated as commentaries

Not in the sense of assigning a Type

I am not asking for any change in type ... I simply want them to appear in the right categories in the Commentaries Passage Guide section or, put another way, I want them to be treated in the same way the other Study Bibles are.

The Type I'm referring to is the PG category. All 21 of my Bible Notes and Study Bible appear under those respective headings in Type. My concern is that they stay that way.

None of them have a Denomination. I don't care if they are assigned, as I don't consider this for Commentaries.

11 do not have an Era, and they should.

ou create a precedent for Bible Notes.

Faithlife has already done this if you explore the Commentaries Passage Guide section.

Now that I am back on feedbear see Commentaries that need denominational tags: | Faithlife for additional examples

Feedback is unavailable to me at this time.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1174718#Comment_1174718

All 21 of my Bible Notes and Study Bible appear under those respective headings in Type. My concern is that they stay that way.

I agree and in no way intended to imply otherwise - my concern is strictly where they appear in the Commentaries section within it various sequences.

None of them have a Denomination.

Some of mine do; some don't - I am most directly concerned with ACELO resources (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran, and Oriental Orthodox) ... others I mention because I happened upon where they belong.

11 do not have an Era

I agree but era happens to be of less interest to me and takes me more time to research so I'll let someone else request them.