Docx files for personal book: Verbum 9 part 1; Verbum 9 part 2; Verbum 9 part 3; Verbum 9 part 4; Verbum 9 part 5; Verbum 9 part 6; Verbum 9 part 7; How to use the Verbum Lectionary and Missal; Verbum 8 tips 1-30; Verbum 8 tips 31-49
Reading lists: Catholic Bible Interpretation
Please be generous with your additional details, corrections, suggestions, and other feedback. This is being built in a .docx file for a PBB which will be shared periodically.
Previous post: Tip 9as Next post: Tip 9au
Lexham clausal outlines
In the coding for Discourse Analysis and High Definition, it was noted that the secondary propositions corresponded to syntactic units:
|
Discourse Analysis / High Definition
|
Syntax
|
|
Secondary propositions: Sub-point
|
Subordinate clause
|
|
Secondary propositions: Elaboration
|
Verbal participles or infinitives following the main verb
|
|
Secondary Propositions: Circumstances
|
Propositions preceding the main action of the sentence
|
|
Bullet
|
No fixed syntax
|
The Verbum library provides a variety of syntactic resources reflecting the every changing capability of natural language processing and computer-aided linguistics. For Greek the resources include:
|
Year
|
Clause analysis
|
Syntax analysis
|
Discourse analysis
|
|
2006
|
Deppe, Dean. The Lexham Clausal Outlines of the Greek New Testament. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2006.
|
Porter, Stanley E., Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Jeffrey T. Reed, and Randall Tan, OpenText.org. The OpenText.org Syntactically Analyzed Greek New Testament: Clause Analysis; OpenText.org Clause Analysis. Logos Bible Software, 2006.
|
|
|
2008-2014
|
|
|
Runge, Steven E. The Lexham High Definition New Testament: ESV Edition. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2008–2014.
|
|
Runge, Steven E. The Lexham Discourse Greek New Testament. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2008–2014.
|
|
2009-2010
|
Lukaszewski, Albert L., and Mark Dubis. The Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament: Sentence Analysis. Logos Bible Software, 2009.
|
Lukaszewski, Albert L., and Mark Dubis. The Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament. Logos Bible Software, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Wu, Andi, and Randall Tan. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the New Testament. Lexham Press, 2009.
|
|
Wu, Andi, and Randall Tan. Cascadia Syntax Graphs of the New Testament: SBL Edition. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2010.
|
|
2011
|
Deppe, Dean. The Lexham Clausal Outlines of the Greek New Testament: SBL Edition. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2011.
|
Lukaszewski, Albert L., Mark Dubis, and J. Ted Blakley. The Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament: SBL Edition. Lexham Press, 2011.
|
|
|
Lukaszewski, Albert L., Mark Dubis, and Ted Blakley. The Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament, SBL Edition: Sentence Analysis. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2011.
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Leedy, Randy A. SBL Greek New Testament Sentence Diagrams. Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2020.
|
|
There are fewer resources covering the Hebrew Old Testament.
|
Year
|
Cantillation analysis
|
Syntax analysis
|
Discourse analysis
|
|
2005
|
|
Talstra, Eep. Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia : WIVU Constituency Trees. Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2005.
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Andersen, Francis I., and A. Dean Forbes. The Hebrew Bible: Andersen-Forbes Phrase Marker Analysis. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2009.
|
|
|
2012-2014
|
|
|
Runge, Steven E., and Joshua R. Westbury, eds. The Lexham High Definition Old Testament: ESV Edition. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012–2014.
|
|
Runge, Steven E., and Joshua R. Westbury, eds. The Lexham Discourse Hebrew Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012–2014.
|
|
2016
|
Andersen, Francis I., and A. Dean Forbes. The Hebrew Bible: Andersen-Forbes Phrase Marker Analysis. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2009.
|
|
|
Required reading:
- “How to Use Clausal Outlines” in Deppe, Dean. The Lexham Clausal Outlines of the Greek New Testament. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2006.
- There appears to be no glossary nor description of the label conventions.
There are two versions available in Visualizations:
For the contents notice the tag on left of relative clause, which is confirmed by the presence of a relative pronoun – note that the hover brings up the expected gutter line.
Because the resource is type:Bible, the Context Menu has the full range of options one expects in a Bible.
The Bible also supports an interlinear:
