Add new version in Morph Search

Hello!😃

I started a BWS from 1Thessalonians 2:3, at the word "ἀποστασίᾳ" (Strong G646). From the TEXTUAL SEARCHES section, I opened the search in the LXX, and in "add versions", I wanted to open my favorite bible. But nothing happens. What am I doing wrong? Thank you!

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Graham Criddle

From the TEXTUAL SEARCHES section, I opened the search in the LXX, and in "add versions", I wanted to open my favorite bible. But nothing happens.

When you click the Add versions option you should get a dropdown menu allowing you to select a Bible. Does this appear?

After selecting a Bible, you might need to click the small arrow to the right of the selection box more than once to cause the version to appear.

(And for anyone else looking at this, I believe the reference is to 2 Thess 2:3 not 1 Thessalonians)

David Thomas

I wanted to open my favorite bible.

Since this is a morph search, the favorite bible must be Reverse-Interlinear tagged.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189314#Comment_1189314

Since this is a morph search, the favorite bible must be Reverse-Interlinear tagged.

This is not strictly the case

A RI-tagged BIble is needed for "sympathetic highlighting" of the results but a non-RI Bible can be added

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189317#Comment_1189317

This is not strictly the case

I stand corrected. Thanks for your clarification.

EDUARDO JIMENEZ

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189344#Comment_1189344

Thanks Graham, David.

By some mystery that I have not been granted to know, it works now! [:O]

EDUARDO JIMENEZ

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189413#Comment_1189413

I wonder when Logos MUST to refresh, because similar situations have happened to me before. Thanks again!

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189413#Comment_1189413

Glad you have it working

Kiyah

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189415#Comment_1189415

That "add versions" box is quirky. Be sure to hit the ENTER key twice after you type in the bible name. It doesn't seem to recognize it when you hit ENTER just once.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189803#Comment_1189803

. It doesn't seem to recognize it when you hit ENTER just once.

If you are cetain of this, report it as a Bug please.

Kiyah

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189806#Comment_1189806

. It doesn't seem to recognize it when you hit ENTER just once.

If you are cetain of this, report it as a Bug please.

It's worked like that at least since Logos 6. I figured it was just how they designed it. It doesn't work that way for you too?

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189807#Comment_1189807

I'm too lazy to try it at the moment but it does not seem compatible with their design policies ... even when it seems odd to me, there has always been an actual purpose for a keystroke or it has been my error e.g. clicking inside rather than outside the pane.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189807#Comment_1189807

. It doesn't seem to recognize it when you hit ENTER just once.

If you are cetain of this, report it as a Bug please.

It's worked like that at least since Logos 6. I figured it was just how they designed it. It doesn't work that way for you too?

I agree - and mentioned this in my previous post above

EDUARDO JIMENEZ

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1189803#Comment_1189803

That "add versions" box is quirky.

Thanks for your contributions!. That "add versions" box is definitely weird. Now it doesn't work! I click on it, type the version I need, press the ENTER key and it just disappears what I wrote. Or, the searched version appears but doesn't list the verses with the corresponding words.

It doesn't run the search, I have to choose the version from the drop down menu.

See the 2nd image below, after I click ENTER again...

Image 2

Philana R. Crouch

Thanks for mentioning this bug. We do have an open case and I've added a link to this thread.