Strange reference formatting
I'm pretty sure this is new. Notice the difference in how the references are formatted in this screenshot. I'm not running the beta, and I've checked both Content and Program scaling.
Was it like this before and I was just absorbed in myself to notice?
Comments
-
I'm assuming you are on Mac. This was an intentional change to match the formatting on Windows. This is done to make it easier understand verses when there are multiple references in the same book or chapter. That said, it looks to me like this isn't looking quite right. I'll make sure a bug report gets written up.
Here's what it looks like on Windows, and what it should look like on Mac:
Andrew Batishko | Logos software developer
0 -
I see; I like the Windows' version. Once the code gets worked out it'll be nice on the Mac. Thanks for the response.
0