I am trying to compare and contrast the canonical Gospels with the “missing gospels." Does anyone have a good plan for me to do this in Logos?
Does anyone have a good plan for me to do this in Logos?
Not in Logos which does little to support apocrypha, pseudepigrapha, gnostic, and other essential peripheral literature.
Description: A unique tool for the study and teaching of the gospels. The entire primary text of Mark is presented in sequence, with parallel texts matched side-by-side. Parallel texts include all the canonical and known extra-canonical texts through 300 C.E.
New Gospel Parallels, Vol. 1 and 2: Mark (Foundations & Facets) by Robert W. Funk would be the resource I'd start with. I don't know if more volumes have been produced.
Can you post a link MJ?
New Gospel Parallels, Vol. 1 and 2: Mark (Foundations & Facets) (New Gospel Parallels) (Foundations & Facets. Reference Series): Robert W. Funk, Robert W. Funk: 9780944344132: AmazonSmile: Books
Off-thread, I was reading just yesterday comments on what gospels, the lost gospels had access to. At best, it was Mark, indeed.
What’s with the dog with wings in the book cover? 😂 That made my night. Alright, time to go to bed. Tonight we get 1 hour less of sleep due to clocks going forward 1 hour.
DAL
What’s with the dog with wings in the book cover?
Sending you back to biology class (or art history) -- that's a winged lion [;)]
Oh my. It DOES look like a dog. Is that why its rank on Amazon is over #2.5 million? 🤔🤪
