LOVE Logos 10 and Mac Air M1!
Short and to the point: Logos 10 flies seamlessly with my 2 year old Mac Air. It ran flawlessly in Logos 9 but blinding fast in v. 10 (I have about 4,300 resources). Logos, you rock!
Comments
-
Thanks for sharing Mitch! I’m pondering to but a MacBook Pro with the M1 pro, but I saw that it didn’t work well with Logos 9. Do I understand it well that with Logo’s 10 it works direct, without extra software?
Bless, Wim0 -
Thanks for sharing Mitch! I’m pondering to but a MacBook Pro with the M1 pro, but I saw that it didn’t work well with Logos 9. Do I understand it well that with Logo’s 10 it works direct, without extra software?
Bless, WimHmm. I'm not sure why some one would say L9 didn't run well on M1. I have a 16" M1 MBP and L9 ran great on it. That being said, L10 runs much, much quicker because it's native on the M1 chip and Rosette isn't used any longer. So, yes, L10 works great and is native.
0 -
Correct, L10 on M1 Mac runs natively and very fast.
0 -
I saw that it didn’t work well with Logos 9.
I see you have the answer about the L10.
You should treat the source of your information about L9 on Mac's as unreliable.
tootle pip
Mike
How to get logs and post them.(now tagging post-apocalyptic fiction as current affairs) Latest Logos, MacOS, iOS and iPadOS
0 -
You should treat the source of your information about L9 on Mac's as unreliable.
To be more generous...
Someone who has an Apple Silicon Mac <may> have a bad experience, but we have no evidence that it was unique to 1) Apple Silicon or 2) macOS in general. Those of us who are regularly in the forums are unaware of any major issues specific and unique to L9 running poorly on Apple Silicon. The same can be said for L10...
DMB has had some issues... but those may be particular to her particular use. If someone had a similar experience, they might say the same thing... but their "reliability" is based upon their own circumstances.
For that matter, our understanding is based upon OUR experience and the testimonials gathererd here in the forums. Perhaps there is a large number of anti forum Logos users running Apple silicon who are having a rough go of it. [:O][:D]
0 -
I had the fastest Intel Macbook prior to upgrading to an M1 Max laptop (I was using a company laptop, and purchased my own laptop to separate my company and private life).
Logos 9 ran much faster under Rosetta on the M1 Max than it did natively on Intel.
Logos 10 made me uninstall Accordance. I run with Internet off on it unless I need to download something (resources, updates). In that mode, Logos 10 now launches in about 4 seconds (vs. 2.5 seconds for Accordance, a meaningless distinction.)
0 -
DMB has had some issues
I'm pretty sure the native M1 fixed the problem with inactive text boxes. I still see popups from underlying Logos windows.
Apparently Bradley assigned the 'performance regression' to 'a future update'. That's reassuring.
0 -
Logos 9 ran fine on MacBook Pro with M1. That is what I have used for nearly two years running Logos 9. Logos 10 is compiled for the m1, m2 chips, so Logos 10 is even faster.
0 -
Logos 9 ran fine on MacBook Pro with M1. That is what I have used for nearly two years running Logos 9. Logos 10 is compiled for the m1, m2 chips, so Logos 10 is even faster.
0
