BUG: automatic reference linking issues
The automatic reference linking needs to be updated a bit:
- it misses 1 Enoch entirely
- it fails to recognize the full title of pseudepigrapha and erroneously links partial titles to Bible books. It's a real nuisance to remember to keep one's eye out for them and remove the links.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Comments
-
Thanks for the report. I'll write up a case for our team to investigate.
0 -
After some further investigation it appears these are considered Pseudepigrapha references, not bible references which we currently dont autotag those data type references.
However, feel free to create a feedback post here for our team.
0 -
After some further investigation it appears these are considered Pseudepigrapha references, not bible references which we currently dont autotag those data type references.
1 Enoch is both Bible and Pseudepigrapha depending on the context ever since Logos included an LXX including it. BUT you totally missed the point on the other three references - I know they are pseudepigrapha that I wouldn't expect to be tagged SO WHY THE BLANK are portions of their reference tagged erroneously as Bible references? I don't really think you want me to create a feedback post for getting the tagging reliable.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Detecting references is hard, especially when we have to do it in multiple languages. As a result, we use the same detection algorithm regardless of your prioritized Bible. I think that's based on our standard Bible datatype rather than any of the LXX datatypes.
We should adjust the algorithm to remove these as false positives. I'll report that as a bug. However, doing that across multiple languages for all the potential OT and NT pseudepigrapha whose names overlap with biblical books we already detect will be a fair bit of work, so I don't know when we'll get to it.
0
