BUG: BWS Translation ring option doesn't take

Run a BWS on a Greek word. The Septuagint Translation ring works as expected. However, the Translation ring gives me an option of Logos LXX which I would expect to display the deuterocanonicals where Greek is the original language. I understand why it doesn't as there is no translation surface text. However, although shown as an option, trying to enter it consistently takes me back to my default Bible. So why is it listed as an option when it is not a legitimate option.

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

DMB

My comment is complete ignorance!

But following Christian's example, I put LES2 in the translation ring, and 1935 Logos LXX in the Septuagint ring. Both look at the OT: one 1178 occurances (LES2; includes apocrpha) and the other 978 (1935 Logos LXX; no apocrypha).

But before I did that, my experience was as you and Graham describe ... choosing a Swete or Logos did nothing (in the Translation ring).

Dave Hooton

However, the Translation ring gives me an option of Logos LXX which I would expect to display the deuterocanonicals where Greek is the original language.

Yes, but it is not a translation! Elsewhere the Greek is a translation from Hebrew and will appear in the Septuagint Section i.e.

Septuagint Translation Section

This section displays a graph of Hebrew words that are translated by the Greek word being studied as found in the Septuagint.

Logos Help. (2022). Faithlife.

LES/LES2 will provide a Translation for the deuterocanonicals.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1266355#Comment_1266355

but it is not a translation

Yes, I figured that out when I took a break to watch a PBS show.

Andrew Batishko

Thanks. I've created a case to fix the problem.