Denise et al. what are your thoughts on my prioritization scheme?

Beloved Amodeo

I bought THAT today. So far, I'm impressed with its coverage. Also, I picked up An Interpretive Lexicon of New Testament Greek. This too, I find useful. How do you find my priorities? Do you recommend any changes?

You can ignore Muraoka; it's there as a place holder to remind me that I have it. And the Greek section is cut off there's more if you're interested.

DMB

Always good when trying to improve Logos' usefulness!

My comments are mainly to 'what will happen'.  Each person will have different preferences.

Hebrew:

- Your Gesenius is going to 'drown out' your hebrew.  HALOT is basically a later version of Gesenius.  If you like Gesenius (I do), of course that's fine. But it'll pretty much pick up everything, for the purpose of single-clicks (vs the top-5 in a right-click)

- Your 3 theologicals will play tag with each other, depending.  So, it really has much to do with your preferences.  I try to put TLOT higher, since it tends to be more in-depth and reduced coverage; the other 'T's pick up the difference.

- I'm not sure the value of putting your DBL's so low ... they'll never come up for air.  Good as a reminder, though.

Greek:

- This is really personal preference.  Having more than 5 only works, if you prioritize limited lexicons higher than broad-coverage lexicons. Your MM would fit that description. Thayer (which I like) and LSJ will pick off most lemmas long before your BDAG, etc.

- In your current list, basically it'll do a top-5 (right-click), whichever you want to see.  It's not going to get beyond your top-5 (since a couple in the top-5), pick off the lemmas, before your over-5 lexicons.

- I don't see a greek analytical; I'm guessing it didn't show in the screen-capture.

Am I confusing you?  If so my fault.  

I'd like your impression on THAT.  I hate to admit a severe temptation.