With 54 votes already, it's astonishing that there has been no response from Logos yet that they're hoping/planning to get this. Please vote if you haven't already. It's a crucial work on Revelation.
https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/the-theology-of-the-book-of-revelation
With 54 votes already, it's astonishing that there has been no response from Logos yet that they're hoping/planning to get this. Please vote if you haven't already. It's a crucial work on Revelation. https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/the-theology-of-the-book-of-revelation https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/the-theology-of-the-book-of-revelation
Upvoted first feedback line above.
2nd feedback line: system says ''idea not found'' on 2 attempts
the idea is not found since the link only goes until "revelatio", the n is not part of it - however, if it was complete, it would be the same as the first link. Don't know if Rosie intended to post another 2nd link existing for he same book.
Now I see, Mick.
2nd feedback line: system says ''idea not found'' on 2 attempts the idea is not found since the link only goes until "revelatio", the n is not part of it - however, if it was complete, it would be the same as the first link. Don't know if Rosie intended to post another 2nd link existing for he same book.
Fixed. Sorry about that. My first paste somehow went wrong and the 'n' was not included in the link. So I deleted it and repasted the link, and then posted. Apparently the old broken link was still included. It's deleted now.
