Metadata Issues: Commentaries

Dave Hooton

• Boettner, L. (1957). The Millennium.
• This is not a Commentary by design, as it only has milestones (for Rev 19:11-20:10) in one chapter out of 22.
• if it still felt that this should be a Commentary, then the Subject should reflect its coverage as "Millennium; Eschatology" is not appropriate.
• The series "Faithlife Biblical and Theological Lists" has inconsistent metadata:
• 4 are Monographs with Headwords
• LLS:FLLISTSBK and LLS:FLLISTSWC have no Subjects
• "Major English Bible Translations" has inappropriate Subject of "Bible--English--Versions"
• I suggest they be Type  Bible Study
• 15 are Commentaries with Subjects that do not have Bible book names
• They have both Headwords and Bible indexes
• I suggest they be Type Study Bible as they are not Commentaries.
• Berean Standard Bible. (2021)
• Is above Title correct as its citation and description is "Berean Study Bible"?
• Subject "Bible." is incomplete

Majo Diaz (Logos)

Hi Dave!

Thank you for your post. We have created cases to look into the issues you report and release an update of these titles. 

Have a great day!