BUG: Reference range on Passage Guide Bible Commentaries

I "count on" the Commentaries to show me the reference range covered because it is a clue as to how much the commentary is focused on my precise pericope. But, as you can see below, for a book such as Malachi the data is highly unpredictable. Note Factbook does a much better job.

Note Factbook does a much better job:

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Dave Hooton

I do not see that in Logos 34.1 nor Verbum 35 beta. The references are complete.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1303967#Comment_1303967

The issue arose on Verbum 35.0.505 on Win 11

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1303971#Comment_1303971

The issue arose on Verbum 35.0.505 on Win 11

You reported in the wrong forum for v.35 Beta 5.

But I cannot reproduce, especially where your panel width is more than sufficient.for the shorter entries like ESVSB and ESVGSB.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304207#Comment_1304207

You reported in the wrong forum for v.35 Beta 5.

Unfortunately, I recently got called out for using the beta forum for an issue unrelated to the beta; I was simply running the beta code. Perhaps, Logos should tell us where they really want non-beta issues reported.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304211#Comment_1304211

Unfortunately, I recently got called out for using the beta forum for an issue unrelated to the beta; I was simply running the beta code. Perhaps, Logos should tell us where they really want non-beta issues reported.

AFAIK this is a code issue as you are using a feature.

Adam Borries (Logos)

Thanks, MJ.

I take it this is a longstanding issue, not a regression in v35. (If you aren't sure, please let us know so we can test in an older version.)

It's good to hear that it's better in Factbook's new Commentaries section! As you might have guessed, we are trying to make Factbook an even better all-in-one tool, that will serve most users/use cases. As we bring some of the most-used guide sections into Factbook, we are also trying to iterate and improve on their designs. One reason for this approach is that Factbook is shared between all platforms (desktop, mobile, and web apps), so they all the get the benefit of the new design. We think that this is better investment than putting effort into the existing guides, which would mean three distinct implementations.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304326#Comment_1304326

(If you aren't sure, please let us know so we can test in an older version.)

I am not certain but I think so.

We think that this is better investment than putting effort into the existing guides, which would mean three distinct implementations.

I strongly agree but make sure my beloved semantic roles don't get buried.