If you read the summary of the article on left, green highlight, it suggests that the article is saying realised eschatology doesn't consider the events of AD 70 as the end of redemptive history.
On the right, green highlight also is the relevant portion of text. But it is a critique of realized eschatology by Sproul that the events of AD 70 while being significant to the Jewish age do not mark the end of redemptive history. He is not suggesting this is a tenant of realized eschatology as the summarization leads one to beleive.
