Tagging Omission in BDAG?
I know that BDAG is not exhaustive in the citations of each use (see "woman"/gyne in 1 Tim 3:11)
But where BDAG DOES cite an example usage it normally highlights in RED.
But, BDAG cites here WITHOUT a red emphasis highlight???
Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).
Comments
-
David Thomas said:
But, BDAG cites here WITHOUT a red emphasis highlight???
The verse / reference selected in the Bible needs to be the one mentioned in BDAG
If you change the ESV to refer to Phil 1:10 you will see the red highlight.
0 -
Graham Criddle said:
The verse / reference selected in the Bible needs to be the one mentioned in BDAG
Thanks Graham! I opened BDAG from the right-click context menu, but I guess the word I selected was in the window but outside of the range. Silly me assumed that if I went through the context menu, then Logos would know what reference I was looking at.
Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).
0 -
David Thomas said:
Silly me assumed that if I went through the context menu, then Logos would know what reference I was looking at.
I think you hit the same bug I frequently hit - Logos does what I asked not what I thought. I keep hoping AI will reach a point where Logos can be controlled by what I meant.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
David Thomas said:
Silly me assumed that if I went through the context menu, then Logos would know what reference I was looking at.
Right-clicking a word doesn't update the reference information - we need to left-click to do that.
And it catches me out many times!
0
