1 Samuel 10:23, וַיִּגְבַּהּ֙, has the Lamed-Heh with the Mappiq in the Lexham Hebrew Bible. This should be tagged as a gutteral verb but it is tagged as a III HE verb:
There could be more tagged like this in the LHB but this needs to be addressed.
This may be the last Saturday bump ... see you on the new forums - and I do hope this bump gets you a response.
Thanks MJ, appreciate all that you do here on the forums. [Y]
Nice catch!
I think that there is some confusion about the terminology used to categorize Hebrew Verbs. Your question brings up the difference between 'guttural verbs' and III He. If you look at the documentation for Hebrew Grammatical Constructions https://ref.ly/logosres/cidbdochebgram?ref=GrammaticalConstructions.weakverb and https://ref.ly/logosres/cidbdochebgram?ref=GrammaticalConstructions.iiihe you will notice that 'guttural verbs' is not a category that we annotated. We used weak verbs because that is the category of most Hebrew Grammars https://ref.ly/logosres/fbhebgrammar?ref=HGRONT.MorphSemSynVerb . Additionally, the Hebrew letter He is considered a guttural, and labeling this verb (וַיִּגְבַּהּ֙) as a III He verb is indicating that it is a weak verb with a guttural letter in the 3rd root position, specifically the weak, guttural consonant is the consonant He. This notation is the standard method of reference in Hebrew grammars. I hope this is helpful. Let me know if you have any more questions, or if I've misunderstood the question you were raising.
@Jason Stone (Logos) another post with missing images.
Thank you.
