Question about a Syntax Query

David Knoll

I am trying to find constructions similar to this:

So I created this query:

I get many results but Jer 31:7 (my model construction) does not show up. What's wrong?

Graham Criddle

Hi David

It may be due to the extra term between the two components in the clause you are looking at.

I modified the search to:

and it found an extra four hits including your model one.

Not sure if this is how it should work!

Graham

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180507#Comment_180507

If the intervening structure(s) is of no consequence then replace it with Anything.

David Knoll

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180520#Comment_180520

Thank you both very much but how do I use the GUI to insert a new box between the two ?

David Knoll

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180524#Comment_180524

Figured it out. Anything is not a box you use the plus sign at the bottom of the upper box.

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180526#Comment_180526

David,

you are right...but also you put "boxes" in between the same way....just so you know.

David Knoll

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180530#Comment_180530

Thank You Robert. As you probably understand I am only beginning to understand the syntax search feuture. I am sorry for the stupid questions.

davidphillips

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/180563#Comment_180563

If it's true that stupid questions don't exist, that's even more true for syntax searching! Asking questions is a great way to learn and get better.