SUGG: Suggest Keylink

Jacob Hantla

With new books being published all the time, it has to be very difficult to Logos to maintain keylinks to all the available resources that are cited within all the various books. But you have an army of readers out there who are reading the books carefully and finding things that aren't keylinked all the time. For example I found footnote citations in my last 3 hours of reading to books which I have (exact same edition even) in my library.

Perhaps, you should implement a reporting feature (like report typo) that says "Suggest Keylink". This would allow us to look up the place where the keylink should go and then suggest it to Logos, making the editing of the resource easy. When we do this, it would be great if the keylink could then be placed in our version of the text.

Logos may even be able to adopt an auto-approval process where, if 2 or 3 users suggest the same keylink it be automatically accepted and added to the next build of the resource. 

Simon’s Brother

Jacob Hantla said:

With new books being published all the time, it has to be very difficult to Logos to maintain keylinks to all the available resources that are cited within all the various books. But you have an army of readers out there who are reading the books carefully and finding things that aren't keylinked all the time. For example I found footnote citations in my last 3 hours of reading to books which I have (exact same edition even) in my library.

Perhaps, you should implement a reporting feature (like report typo) that says "Suggest Keylink". This would allow us to look up the place where the keylink should go and then suggest it to Logos, making the editing of the resource easy. When we do this, it would be great if the keylink could then be placed in our version of the text.

Logos may even be able to adopt an auto-approval process where, if 2 or 3 users suggest the same keylink it be automatically accepted and added to the next build of the resource. 

 

I use report typo for this at the moment..but would much rather a more directed solution such as this ...as its really not a typo...