Concise BDAG vs BDAG
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f58b/5f58ba7a955f1bf8efe22ed298ec2551356af3a4" alt="1Cor10 31"
Hi everyone!
I have both Concise BDAG and BDAG. Sometimes, I just want the list of verses with a given meaning/sense (I don't know the exact technical word for this). This seems to be much easier to accomplish with Concise BDAG rather than BDAG. So my question is: Are the references in Concise BDAG the same as in the regular BDAG? Or, does Concise BDAG give only a select list? More generally, what part of BDAG is made "concise" in Concise BDAG?
Thank you all
I believe in a Win-Win-Win God.
Best Answer
-
I guess I'm drawing a blank on a concise BDAG. There's a Concise Danker:
If so, below is a comparison. It's a mixed bag, in that 'concise' is relative to senses and Bible refs both. Sometimes it combines BDAG senses. Keeps some references, drops others. Pick and choose.
Personally, Rick's
is far better, both having a more complete list, and grouping them relative to Lou Nida."If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
1
Comments
-
I guess I'm drawing a blank on a concise BDAG. There's a Concise Danker:
If so, below is a comparison. It's a mixed bag, in that 'concise' is relative to senses and Bible refs both. Sometimes it combines BDAG senses. Keeps some references, drops others. Pick and choose.
Personally, Rick's
is far better, both having a more complete list, and grouping them relative to Lou Nida."If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
1 -
Does the entry for John 1:3, John 3:5 refers to the knowledge and power or to the ALL things under (B) listed above.
0 -
Thanks DMB. I guess I will stick to BDAG.
This makes me wonder: what is the purpose of Concise BDAG? When would people use the Concise version?
btw, I too like the Analytical Lexicon .
I believe in a Win-Win-Win God.
0