Missing Data for IVP Pocket Dictionary for the Study of NT Greek
Many thanks for the recent correction to Meta data for the two new volumes in the 'Opening Up' Commentary Series, but there is a similar problem for the IVP Pocket Dictionary for the Study of NT Greek which should be naturally part of the 'IVP Pocket Dictionary' Series. Other titles include:
- Pocket Dictionary of Apologetics and Philosophy of Religion
- Pocket Dictionary of Biblical Studies
- Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms
Can the
- Pocket Dictionary for the Study of New Testament Greek
join the others please. Thank you
Comments
-
This is already noted in Metadata correction proposals page on the wiki, which is the repository for such requests.
I also noticed in the process of checking there that the New Dictionary of Sacramental Worship is incorrectly marked as being part of the "IVP Pocket Dictionary" series. I've added that to the wiki page.
0 -
Sorry Rosie for putting my request in the wrong place, but in truth I think I have mentioned this metadata issue once before a long time ago and it still hasn't been corrected. How long does it take to fix these things? [:)]
0 -
Stephen Thorp said:
Sorry Rosie for putting my request in the wrong place, but in truth I think I have mentioned this metadata issue once before a long time ago and it still hasn't been corrected. How long does it take to fix these things?
No worries: you can report these problems wherever you feel comfortable doing it, and someone will transfer it over to the wiki if it isn't there yet. I was just assuring you that Logos knows about this one already.
It sometimes takes a long time for them to get around to metadata fixes. Some of the ones on that list have been there for months. I really don't know how they prioritize which ones to fix. Sometimes they'll do a whole mess of fixes at once and knock 15 or more items of the to do list. Other time they'll fix something immediately if lots of people shout about it in concert on the forum (as they did with the missing series metadata for the just released "Opening Up" commentary update). Sometimes I guess they wait until they're doing other similar things and do them all together. I personally don't see why it wouldn't take one person about one day to go through all the metadata problems reported on that wiki page and fix them all. But I don't have the mind of a Logos data person, so I might be misunderstanding how trivial these fixes would be.
0
