Michael Bird : Romans: Greek-English Interlinear | Paraphrase | Study Notes

Has anyone used this book? I can only get it to work as a Reverse Interlinear, which (i) is contrary to the product description and (ii) frankly is useless for anyone wanting to read the Greek (which is exactly what the book encourages). Sadly. Logos customer support just couldn't understand the issue. I have ordered the print edition instead, which I am sure will be a great resource. However, for the Logos version, if it only works as a reverse Intelinear, then it becomes completely useless - or am I missing something?

Find more posts tagged with

Lexham Press

Interlinears

Accepted answers

All comments

DMB

https://www.logos.com/product/305970/romans-greek-english-interlinear-paraphrase-study-notes

Your copy doesn't look like the screen-copy on the above sales page?

"Each volume in the Lexham Interpreter’s Translation includes three versions of the text: the SBL Greek, a literal English translation, and a lively paraphrase that captures Scripture’s meaning and rhetoric in modern English. "

Granted, not a word-by-word interlinear.

Chris jefferis

I guess against that description, it does what it says. But it also says ‘Bird provides a Greek-English interlinear’, which then Logos product clearly doesn’t. I think they need to correct this description, which in my view is badly misleading

DMB

BTW welcome to the forum! Maybe not an entirely satisfactory issue though.

Chris jefferis

Thanks - I have ordered a print copy instead!

DMM

Did you see this review? I guess this book comes as three different resources.

Though odd they only give a screen shot of the print book. Nothing from the digital version, and there's no option to look inside.

Remember you can return it within 30 days for a refund.

MJ. Smith

I think this is an example of how it is to be used. It took me a bit of effort to find what I needed to enter to get the 3 parts "Lexham Interpreter's Translation". Even then, it was obvious that it would give me all 3 parts. One could also used linked sets.

I'm not quite sure what the problem is … to me, the description seems accurate.