What tagging does a resource need for advanced prioritization?
I am teaching through the book of Acts and would like to prioritize certain resources just for Acts.
I have succeeded with "Paul and his letters" where if I am in Acts and right click (on a mac) the resource is first in the menu, only in Acts (great feature)
I would like to do this with "A harmony of St. Paul" as well and others but I am guess it needs a particular tagging.... how can I tell which resources I can do this with?
Comments
-
The resource should be indexed by Bible reference. You can see this information in the panel of the commentary etc.
Prov. 15:23
0 -
It's the indexing that matters. To be able to prioritize a resource for use just within a book of the Bible, the resource would need to have a Bible index.
A Harmony of the Life of St. Paul does not. You can see what indexes a resource has by opening the info panel (click the "i" icon) while the resource is open:
Paul and His Letters has both a Page index and a Bible index. Since A Harmony of St. Paul often has parallel passages from different books of the Bible together on the same page, it would be kind of hard to implement a Bible index for that resource. But in general, if you come across a work that you think ought to have a Bible index and is missing it, the way to report that would be by adding it to http://wiki.logos.com/Books_Missing_Pagination_and_Other_Indexes
EDIT: As usual, someone else beat me to it with a nice succinct answer, because I was taking time to tell you probably more than you needed to know and illustrate it with pretty pictures. [:$]
0 -
Rosie Perera said:
EDIT: As usual, someone else beat me to it with a nice succinct answer, because I was taking time to tell you probably more than you needed to know and illustrate it with pretty pictures.
If I wanted to be really devious I could edit my post to add the pretty pictures and show an example of something that has advanced priorities set for Acts. [6]
Prov. 15:23
0 -
Rosie Perera said:
EDIT: As usual, someone else beat me to it with a nice succinct answer, because I was taking time to tell you probably more than you needed to know and illustrate it with pretty pictures.
Actually it was the picture that clued me in..... takes a bit [:P] Thanks for the help
0
