because all of the "tools" would be listed in the left column and user-created resources on the right.
What think ye?
I agree as I was looking for this last week for ten minutes thinking it would be where you suggest. However, I think because it is relevant only to the passage reference, it appears where it does. Seems to make sense after a bit.
It would be quicker to access, but wouldn't necessarily make more sense. If you think about it, it doesn't matter to notes or clippings what content type it is receiving. Whatever the text may be, you can add it to a note or a clipping. But passage lists require something specific: a verse, a reference, not just any highlighted text. So putting that option under "reference" reflects that the passage list only works with references.
However, I think because it is relevant only to the passage reference, it appears where it does. Seems to make sense after a bit.
I don't get it. What is the logic?
ok, I see now. Thanks Chris
because all of the "tools" would be listed in the left column and user-created resources on the right. What think ye?
Your problem is that you expect things to be logical. Haven't you learned yet that logic has nothing to do with matters? [;)]
Your problem is that you expect things to be logical. Haven't you learned yet that logic has nothing to do with matters?
You stole my line[:'(]
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
