I installed L4 Basic a few weeks ago and am still getting used to the new interface/conventions. I went looking for a commentary coming from a Charismatic/Pentecostal viewpoint. I came up dry and I'm wondering why. (No rhyme intended. :>) Seems to me that some of this kind of work should be included in the Basic package. The only thing I can find with a Charismatic/Pentecostal orientation is Foundations of Pentecostal Theology, a systematic theology, not a commentary.
Is there a prejudice against Charismatic/Pentecostal works at Logos?
I love some of the classic commentaries and am grateful to have them available through Logos, but am tired of having to wade around the cessationist assumptions most of them make. When I use a commentary I'm looking for clear thinking that is free of false logic to help me think things through. I found a post from 2010 in the Suggestions section of this forum that had lots and lots of good suggestions -- the reply list is exceptionally long -- so it's not like the Logos managers don't have material to draw from. Which brings me back to the question I posed above -- is the reason these materials are lacking because Logos management just doesn't like the Charismatic/Pentecostal movement? I hope I'm wrong.
Would love to hear your thoughts.