Could someone explain why the Lexham Syntactic GNT has tagged the following pronoun as an indirect object?
I guess this explains it -- the difference between form and function.
Ideally we would use morph search for form and a syntactical search for function, but in reality some searches for forms are much easier using the syntactical search. Reckon we need to be aware of the limitations in using the tools in this way though.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
