I don't know who to report this to but I found some errors in one of the books in Logos.
When you click on the reference it gives a reference in Acts which doesn't make any sense with the context.
Here's the incorrect statement in Logos.
2. In 2 Peter 1:19–21 what the apostle Peter asserts is more than the divine origin of Scripture (as 2 Tim. 3:16–17 does). Here he adds to the understanding of how God produced the Scriptures. This was accomplished through the instrumentality of men who “spoke from God.” More specifically, these spokesmen were “moved along by the Holy Spirit” (cf. Acts 27:5). In the context of this passage, Peter has assured his readers that what he was making known to them was not by “cleverly devised tales (mythos)” (v. 16) nor even personal experience (v. 18). Instead, it was “the prophetic word made more sure” (v. 19). Here is an implicit affirmation of the authority (certainty) of the “prophetic word” presented by eyewitnesses (Peter, James, John) of the Lord (Matt. 17:1, 13). “No prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God” (2 Peter 1:21).
Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. (Chicago: Moody Press, 1986), 36.
Here's the corrected scriptures. I've bolded what was wrong.
More specifically, these spokesmen were “moved along by the Holy Spirit”
(II Peter 1:21). In the context of this passage, Peter has assured his readers
that what he was making known to them was not by “cleverly devised tales (mythos)” (II Peter 1:16) nor even personal
experience (II Peter 1:18). Instead, it was “the prophetic word made more sure” (II Peter 1:19). Here is
an implicit affirmation of the authority (certainty) of the “prophetic word”
presented by eyewitnesses (Peter, James, John) of the Lord (Matt. 17:1, 13).
“No prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy
Spirit spoke from God” (2 Peter 1:21).
