OT exegetical versions compared to 1995 Contemporary English VersionPractical Commentary on Scripture2 Corinthians 6:14.Plus a discussion about initial Logos purchase:Poll: Logos Catholic books electronic collect for 100s of $. OpinionsWanted! (Lenghty post)
I have written a new post in the thread OT exegetical versions compared to 1995 Contemporary English Version about Ro.
I wrote a new post in the 2 Corinthians 6:14. -thread: Here is a brief thread...!
bump! The "Practical Commentary" -thread is still current, posts are being updated and new posts are welcome. Despite what it seems like from some of the first posts in the thread, it's dedicated to scholarly commentaries that are of value today. www.christianforums.com/t7541241New posts are welcome over there:
Practical Commentary on Scripture
New posts with reviews are welcome in the thread "Practical Commentary on Scripture": www.christianforums.com/t7541241:
bump! The "Practical Commentary" -thread is still current, posts are being updated and new posts are welcome. Despite what it seems like from some of the first posts in the thread, it's dedicated to scholarly commentaries that are of value today. www.christianforums.com/t7541241:Practical Commentary on Scripture
For Bible versions and specifications for which passages and books of the Bible to use which ones, see: http://www.christianforums.com/threads/why-the-niv-cannot-be-the-word-of-god-even-thought-it-contains-portions-of-gods-word.7890465/page-9#post-68033020
Unix, N/A, Brian
What you are doing is against the forum guidelines and you should know better.
Matthew, You are mistaking me for someone else. I only have this one account.
