we need more concordance books options on here

I knew I only got one on my libray and my seminarey think they very important. Would you consider get more option such as for nrsv or esv verson of this please ? Such as

1. Kohlenberger, John R. The NRSV Concordance Unabridged: Including the Apocryphal/Deuteroncanoical Books. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1991.

2. Morrison, Clinton. An Analytical Concordance to the Revised Standard Version of the New Testament. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1979.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

George Somsel

I knew I only got one on my libray and my seminarey think they very important. Would you consider get more option such as for nrsv or esv verson of this please ? Such as

1. Kohlenberger, John R. The NRSV Concordance Unabridged: Including the Apocryphal/Deuteroncanoical Books. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1991.

2. Morrison, Clinton. An Analytical Concordance to the Revised Standard Version of the New Testament. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1979.

Personally, I can't think of anything more useless in Logos than a concordance. If you need to find some particular word, all you need to do is to run a search on it. It's about as useful as the proverbial appendages on a boar to have a concordance.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403706#Comment_403706

Normally, I'd agree since the Logos search function is pretty useful. However the Logos power lookup combined with concordances makes for very fast lookup across both the OT and NT at the same time, including quick drilldowns into which hebrew or greek is involved. Don't know if many people know this.

In the instance below, I prioritized the NASB concordance to catch english double-clicks. Then while casually reading in Hebrews, I double-clicked 'rest' which brought up the concordance, with the power lookup bringing in all the uses in both the OT and NT plus quick references to which hebrew or greek word is involved.

Obviously a formal search, if you knew how (the double lookups at the same time), might be more accurate, but when you just want a quick lookup, a concordance can really speed up study. This is especially true when you're in a commentary or regular book where a right-click won't quickly do a Bible search.

Father Seamus

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403725#Comment_403725

Thank both of you and I try that too. I just thinking of fellow seminarians out there.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

Logos does have: http://www.logos.com/product/4580/lexham-analytical-lexicon-to-the-greek-new-testament that is included in Scholar's Silver and above along with Catholic Scholar's Library.

Noticed Logos has an Everyday Concordance => http://www.logos.com/product/3091/everyday-access-your-bible-concordance

Community Pricing has a Lexicon and Concordance => http://www.logos.com/product/8512/a-critical-lexicon-and-concordance-to-the-english-and-greek-new-testament that does not have enough bids (yet) to cover 100 % of estimated production cost.

An alternative to a concordance is => http://www.logos.com/product/1214/the-new-treasury-of-scripture-knowledge

Keep Smiling [:)]

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403725#Comment_403725

A bit OT, but illustrating the value of a 3rd language (concordance) to evaluate 2 earlier languages, Lev 4:12 in the illustration above is interesting. Some translations go with 'rest' (as NASB, ESV, ISV, etc) while other ones go with 'whole'. Then you have NET (also Tanakh) that wrings its pages and goes with both ('all the rest').

I suppose NET felt a little guilty and so had a lengthy note: 'All of v. 11 is a so-called casus pendens (also known as an extraposition or a nominative absolute), which means that it anticipates the next verse, being the full description of “all (the rest of) the bull” (lit. “all the bull”) at the beginning of v. 12 (actually after the first verb of the verse; see the next note below).'

Interestingly the Massorah lists further connects on the usage.

This would be a good example to check how the Lexham Discourse OT handles these two verses next week.

fgh

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403734#Comment_403734

Logos does have:

There is also The Catholic Bible Concordance: Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition on prepub.

Philana Crouch

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403725#Comment_403725

Normally, I'd agree since the Logos search function is pretty useful. However the Logos power lookup combined with concordances makes for very fast lookup across both the OT and NT at the same time, including quick drilldowns into which hebrew or greek is involved. Don't know if many people know this.

In the instance below, I prioritized the NASB concordance to catch english double-clicks. Then while casually reading in Hebrews, I double-clicked 'rest' which brought up the concordance, with the power lookup bringing in all the uses in both the OT and NT plus quick references to which hebrew or greek word is involved.

Obviously a formal search, if you knew how (the double lookups at the same time), might be more accurate, but when you just want a quick lookup, a concordance can really speed up study. This is especially true when you're in a commentary or regular book where a right-click won't quickly do a Bible search.

.

I would agree except you can easily save a search as a passage list. And get the list that way, even adding additional translations for comparison.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403819#Comment_403819

Of course Logos oddly didn't allow linking passage lists (to the 2nd word in their corporate title), so one has to return to concordances.

Probably one could export the list, then bring it back in as a PB and then link that.

I still think Logos doesn't use Logos.

Father Seamus

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/403850#Comment_403850

You never know. Lol