I'm not sure if this should be a correction or a suggestion, but I'm putting it hear since it involves a new feature of Logos 5: the Sermon Starter Guide (SSG).
Do a SSG on "Baptism" and open the section called "Practice of baptism" scroll down to
Passages apparently negating infant baptism
Ac 2:38–41 infants cannot repent and believe; Ga 3:7 Under the new covenant it is faith in Jesus Christ, not an outward sign, that makes a person a child of God.
[I'm not arguing yet.]
Now scroll down to this (not sure why these two are separated):
Passages which may imply infant baptism
The “households” (not merely individuals) may well have included children:
Ac 16:15; Ac 16:33; Ac 18:8; 1 Co 1:16
Mk 10:13–16; 1 Co 7:14; Col 2:11–12 If baptism is here equated with circumcision, this suggests baptism is the sign of the new covenant.
Okay, here's the correction: Acts 2:38-39 is also used by those who support infant baptism, specifically the phrase "for you and your children."
I do not want to start to debate infant baptism, or whether this passage actually does or does not imply infant baptism. But among those who support infant baptism, this passage is one key passage (e.g. Heidelberg Catechism Q&A 74). I'm sure there are other passages that could be added here as well (namely those cited by this Q&A in the HC), but I was drawn to this one because I was surprised to see it in the "negating" section, when I've always seen this passage as an important part of the "implying" section.
EDIT: corrected the verse #'s from Acts 2.
