Resource Update Issue -- Again!

Greetings!

A few days ago I was pleased to see the updating of a variety of my Logos resources, including the pricey but indispensable Gottingen Septuagint (67 vols.).

It would be quite helpful if Logos would post an errata page so we can ascertain where these specific updates (presumably in most cases error corrections) have been made.

This is a small but reasonable request.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Rosie Perera

It's probably tagging. They've been adding a lot more new tagging to resources lately because of the new datasets in Logos 5.

tfjern

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/424926#Comment_424926

That's nice to know, but could we please hear straight from the horses mouth to find out for sure?

Mark O'Hearn

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/424964#Comment_424964

Best way to ask a question to Logos and avoid the community of users is to call or e-mail them directly.

Regards

Rick Brannan (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/424964#Comment_424964

That's nice to know, but could we please hear straight from the horses mouth to find out for sure?

I guess I'm the horse.

With Göttingen (and some other LXX Greek resources) there was an issue with the way contractions were encoded, particularly on prepositions like μετʼ or απʼ.

There will probably be no easily discernable visible difference, but these situations are now properly handled.

DMB

I'll add my [Y] to tfjern's comment posing as an implied question (reading my discourse resources).

I very much doubt it's feasible to actually do this (correcting the texts AND keep a running account of correcting the text). Certainly not tagging. Or spelling errors (which surprisingly exist in the face of Bob saying they double-enter).

But per chance they correct manuscript type resources (as Rick with the Gottingen, or similar), it'd be helpful (if indeed they're correcting it). Hopefully it's tagging. Although reading about some of the updates to the various text forms, correcting the print copy (not Logos) is surprising too.