It appears that the Book of Jubilees is not recognized as a (limited) canonical text for URL purposes. What is the broadest canon that is supported?
Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament R. H. Charles, D. has it.
I suspect the texts that are supported would be the ones found on this list.
Weirdly, it includes the Epistle to the Laodiceans (not canonical for anyone, to my knowledge), but doesn't include Jubilees (despite its inclusion in the Ethiopian canon).
The Bible Data types model Bibles, not canons.
The new data type system in Logos 4 does allow us to support extended canons. So if we ever get a license or files to an Ethiopian or Amharic Bible, we will be able to add Jubilees to that Bible data type, as well as the data types that cover the 'biblical' portions of pseudepigrapha collections. We simply don't have any Bibles that contain this book yet. We do, however, have Bibles which include the Epistle to the Laodiceans, which is why that is included already. Another example: the Swete (shorter Cambridge) LXX includes Enoch so that is covered in the appropriate Bible data types.
So if we ever get a license or files to an Ethiopian or Amharic Bible, we will be able to add Jubilees to that Bible data type, as well as the data types that cover the 'biblical' portions of pseudepigrapha collections. We simply don't have any Bibles that contain this book yet.
Makes perfect sense ... I would not have even noticed if I had not been updating topics.logos. We need to make Logos 4 appeal to Bob Marley fans to develop the market.[:D]
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
