Close tabs more quickly

Mary-Ellen

It would be nice if the "X" to close a tab appeared when hovering over the tab, like in IE, so that tabs could be closed as quickly as you can click, without having to wait for their contents to appear on the screen.

fgh

If you use a mouse, any tab can be closed with a middle-click. No need to first make it active.

George Somsel

Mary-Ellen Vian said:

It would be nice if the "X" to close a tab appeared when hovering over the tab, like in IE, so that tabs could be closed as quickly as you can click, without having to wait for their contents to appear on the screen.

<ctrl-F4> and it's gone.  [Bye-bye]  [:)]

BTW:  I'm still getting used to the new location of the "x" to close (which, as I explained, isn't necessary), but it should be considered an improvement in that it will cut down on the likelihood of closing the wrong panel. [Yes, I've done that]

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441195#Comment_441195

And actually 'displaying' the tab would be nice in order to either click it closed or as proposed 'hover' it closed.  Not wishing to disagree with the OP per se, but (as on my PC) hovering doesn't do a lot (touch-screen) nor of course for the matter the Cntrl-F4 approach, nor for that matter the middle mouse click.

Interesting the interfaces.

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441179#Comment_441179

fgh said:

If you use a mouse, any tab can be closed with a middle-click. No need to first make it active.

Hooray!  (How did you ever find out about this?)

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/442095#Comment_442095

Mary-Ellen said:

fgh said:

If you use a mouse, any tab can be closed with a middle-click. No need to first make it active.

Hooray!  (How did you ever find out about this?)

It was flagged as an undocumented feature at http://community.logos.com/forums/p/26295/196062.aspx#196062[:)]

I don't know who first found it!

 

 

 

 

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/442099#Comment_442099

A thread worth reading -- thanks once again, Graham!