Add a "Sort by most recently used" option to Library in Logos Desktop app

I like the "most recently used" library view on the iOS app. Would love to see that feature added to the library in the desktop version of Logos as well. Perhaps as additional column with "last opened" date which you can sort by.
Comments
-
[Y]
Gold package, and original language material and ancient text material, SIL and UBS books, discourse Hebrew OT and Greek NT. PC with Windows 11
0 -
This would be a very powerful tool.
Imagine if you wanted to search the entire Bible for every plant mentioned. You would have to list out every single plant in your search statement and guess at the possible results to know if you have included enough. What would be great is if you could do something like search TAGS for <plants>.
All verses that other users have tagged as "plants" would be included in the results such as verses about mustard seeds, tree of life, fig tree, papyrus, etc. All verses that you couldn't find simply by searching for the term "plant".
I think you can begin to see the possibilities of such a feature and why so many on this thread are so enthusiastic about getting this feature added. Keep making noise on this thread!
0 -
I think you must have meant to post on some other thread?
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Dennis Kramer said:
Imagine if you wanted to search the entire Bible for every plant mentioned
That is a very different requirement to the one being discussed in this thread.
You can already do what you are asking for with "Louw-Nida tagging". This tags "domains" and the domains are defined in the "Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament based on Semantic Domains". Domain "3" is for plants.
New Testaments with Reverse Interlinears can be searched for this domain as below
The OT is not tagged with these domains but the "Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: Hebrew (Old Testament)" is and can be searched
Do you have these resources? is this helpful to you?
Dennis Kramer said:why so many on this thread are so enthusiastic about getting this feature added
I don't understand this comment - there was the original request and one supported in Feb 2013 and nothing since then!
0