edited by David G. K. Taylor
Society of Biblical Literature, 1999
While you're at it, I'd love to see Logos carry a lot more of SBL's monographs:
http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/browsebyseries.aspx
While you're at it, I'd love to see Logos carry a lot more of SBL's monographs: http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/browsebyseries.aspx
[Y] Yes, please.
I notice on Amazon, that just since Rosie made this suggestion, the used price on Amazon has already DOUBLED!!
(I squeaked in at $2.03 which is STILL higher than Matthew's average library price). I am looking forward to reading it though. Certainly a Logos version would be nice.
There is a good article on Dura Parchment 24 in this one.
Parker, D. C., D. K. G. Taylor, and M. S. Goodacre. “The Dura-Europos Gospel Harmony.” Pages 192–228 in Studies in the Early Text of the Gospels and Acts: The Papers of the First Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Edited by D. K. G. Taylor. Text-Critical Studies. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 1999.
See, my suggestions carry weight. Amazon second hand sellers see me recommend something, and they know the demand will skyrocket so they raise their prices. [:)]
See, my suggestions carry weight.
So do mine—I need to go on a diet since even walking the dog 4x/day or so doesn't seem to help much.
As noted above, I ordered a used copy before the Amazon used price more than doubled. Whew.
But what a 'delicious' book! I don't know the tastes of other forum members, so here's a sampling:
- Discussion of the 1897 Oxford debate regarding the Textus Receptus (JL North seems to try again to get a stake through its beating heart)
- Using probability theory to 'unlock' textual history (G Farthing)
- Syriac evidence for the 'pre-Johnine text' of the gospel (JW Childers)
- Where is Emmeus? (Rosie mentioned this one)
- Dura-Europos (Rick mentioned this above, and now we have Rick's work in the same text)
Nifty book!
I don't know if anyone likes to read Dean Forbes stuff on OT textual patterns; this book is a nice complement in the NT gospels. If you're not familiar with Dean Forbes' analyses here's a sample uploaded from his site:
3157.Andersen Dwelling On Spelling.pdf
Absolutely!
mm.
