Analysis Results Beta 4

Dave Hooton

5.1 Beta 4 Release Notes said:

Search Analysis

• Improved grouping of search results into rows.
• Fixed bug which caused all Roots and Lemmas to be listed in the same row as each Form. (See this thread.)

Presentation of results has improved. It would help, though, if the order of comma separated terms was consistent. Example - search for Birth in ESV. At Mt 19:12 the Forms are listed in the order of the words in ESV but the Greek Strong's and Lemmas do not correspond to that order. Same with Mk 7:26, Act 14:8 etc.

5.1 Beta 4 Release Notes said:

Fixed bug which caused Result column to be split into multiple rows when hit text contains multiple words.

Certainly is fixed. Example - search for "has shown me" in ESV. The result for Act 10:28 shows one line only in Analysis view. The potential confusion is that "me" has two LN# & two Parts of Speech (compound Greek word) so this won't be revealed.

Net result is the loss of the analysis "grid" as every result is condensed into one line, but I'm reasonably satisfied as long as the order of comma separated items is the same as the resource text.

What do others think?

kelly.flones

Dave Hooton said:

Presentation of results has improved. It would help, though, if the order of comma separated terms was consistent. Example - search for Birth in ESV. At Mt 19:12 the Forms are listed in the order of the words in ESV but the Greek Strong's and Lemmas do not correspond to that order. Same with Mk 7:26, Act 14:8 etc.

I have created a case for this issue and passed it to Development for investigation.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/480589#Comment_480589

Thanks Kelly.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/480589#Comment_480589

Kelly Flones said:

Dave Hooton said:

Presentation of results has improved. It would help, though, if the order of comma separated terms was consistent. Example - search for Birth in ESV. At Mt 19:12 the Forms are listed in the order of the words in ESV but the Greek Strong's and Lemmas do not correspond to that order. Same with Mk 7:26, Act 14:8 etc.

I have created a case for this issue and passed it to Development for investigation.

Thanks for the fix in Beta 5

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/485410#Comment_485410

Dave Hooton said:

Kelly Flones said:

Dave Hooton said:

Presentation of results has improved. It would help, though, if the order of comma separated terms was consistent. Example - search for Birth in ESV. At Mt 19:12 the Forms are listed in the order of the words in ESV but the Greek Strong's and Lemmas do not correspond to that order. Same with Mk 7:26, Act 14:8 etc.

I have created a case for this issue and passed it to Development for investigation.

Thanks for the fix in Beta 5

Mark Barnes,

Are you satisfied with the new Analysis results presentation?  Can you still use Analysis as you did in Logos 5.0  e.g. to count lemmas in a book?

Thanks.

Mark Barnes

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/491547#Comment_491547

Dave Hooton said:

Can you still use Analysis as you did in Logos 5.0  e.g. to count lemmas in a book?

Do you mean "Count distinct lemmas in a book"? I don't recall ever doing that, although I guess you could fairly easily with an excel export. Counting total words is easy, as I'm sure you know.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/491555#Comment_491555

Mark Barnes said:

Dave Hooton said:

Can you still use Analysis as you did in Logos 5.0  e.g. to count lemmas in a book?

Do you mean "Count distinct lemmas in a book"?

My concern is that the new analysis format hasn't created issues for any previous usage, as I rarely used it.

Mark Barnes

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/491650#Comment_491650

Dave Hooton said:

My concern is that the new analysis format hasn't created issues for any previous usage, as I rarely used it.

It's not perfect, but I certainly haven't noticed anything worse.