BUG 5.1: Recognition of metadata
I knew of three volumes in this untagged series, and wondered if I had any more:
Seemingly, I don't even have the three that I know I have[:O]:
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
Comments
-
I contacted the appropriate department, and they are already aware of this issue which they are currently working on solving.
0 -
Forgive me if I misunderstand you, but when one of you talk about "the appropriate department", I believe you generally mean Text Development or something like that. The issue I'm talking about is that the Library find box doesn't seem to read the metadata in the citation in the Info Panel. That sounds like an issue for Development.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Actually, it is an issue for Text Development. If you looked at the 'Series' column for these resources it was blank, which was the issue. It looks like it has already been fixed, though the series name has been updated.
0 -
Tonya J Ross said:
Actually, it is an issue for Text Development. If you looked at the 'Series' column for these resources it was blank, which was the issue.
I did look at the Series column, and that was one issue. One that I reported at http://wiki.logos.com/compare.aspx?id=8391c19f-5d87-49e4-bb4b-afae2994b03a&before=733&after=734 just before or just after writing the OP.[;)] I believe that is the correct place.[:)] Plus I wouldn't want to bother you with a trifle like that.[:)]
What I've tried to report here was the other issue I found: that the find box doesn't read the metadata in the citation. Adding a series name isn't going to solve that.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
What I've tried to report here was the other issue I found: that the find box doesn't read the metadata in the citation. Adding a series name isn't going to solve that.
I see. The library search field does not search the citation by design. Instead, it searches a subset of the metadata that has been broken up into single fields: title, author, publisher, description, etc.
0
