I love the bibliography tool. It is an excellent way to save a lot of time on research. I only with there were two additions to it (and I'm counting bibliography and citation tools in the same category):
1) It would be useful to have an option of setting my own Bibliographic citation format. I say this only because they ALL need editing anyway, no matter what format you set them for.
2) I also would love the option to be able to manually enter Bibliographic data into my bibliography documents. Whether this means that I manually type them in, or it has the ability to enter the data from outside the program. I know there is a "from clipboard" option, but this does not work from outside the program.
There are lots of programs that are strongly recommended for Biblical scholarship: zotero, endnote, etc. and I have experienced some scoffing from Prof's about the Logos program "not being able" to handle resources outside the software's resources (which I need to refer to as "digital library" to avoid condescending reactions, but then ALWAYS have to deal with the knee-jerk "but there are PDF's" nonsense--which is a softball to deal with).
I know Logos has the power to take the programming of a measly bibliographic program like Endnote and incorporate its abilities to deal with any resource. Now, ultimately, I would just have every resource in my library anyway, and simply continue my interest-free payment plan indefinitely, lol. My faith in this outstanding company to deliver world-class-performance is never shaken. Never. As a matter of fact, the second I saw a demonstration of this "bibliographic" software I immediately said to myself--This is nothing more than a manually-operated, digital-library management tool that simply houses/plays with the bibliographic info--It's a mini-LOGOS! Of course, as you might imagine this did not garner much approbation. But I remain unshaken. Logos Digital libraries have brought me through an MDiv, MA-and thesis, and now I have every confidence in my PhD program. You simply have never let me down. If measly programs like Endnote can generate all this praise for playing around with bibliographic data--I say let LOGOS at this eentsy-weentsy-tiddly-piddly little assignment. Please.
You have never failed to deliver Logos Team. Never.
