BUG 5.1b SR1: Auto Bookmarks misplaced

Not sure when Philippians became part of the OT?

All those auto bookmarks in the middle actually come from the NT.

-- Now this is weird, or should I say even more weird: I just opened the NRSV to see if it was a resource issue. I saw the same thing there -- but when I closed the NRSV tab on top of it, Bibel 82 suddenly looked OK. Unfortunately, closing and reopening either Bible brings the incorrect marks back.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Angela Murashov

All those auto bookmarks in the middle actually come from the NT.

I am having a difficult time reproducing this in both the NRSV and Bibel-82 resource. Can you please provide me with some reproduction steps?

fgh

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/533745#Comment_533745

Can you please provide me with some reproduction steps?

Nope.[:)] I just happened to move the cursor over the scroll bar and noticed something was very very wrong. Still is, in every full Bible I've tried that happens to have any auto bookmarks near the middle.

And I reindexed just before the OP, so that isn't the issue either.

Will logs help in any way?

EDIT: Is it possible that this is in some way related to Bug: History has lost its way? (Presumably a long shot, but both have to do with getting earlier visited references wrong, so I thought it worth mentioning. Especially since you could reproduce that one.[:)])

fgh

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/533945#Comment_533945

I'm still seeing this...

fgh

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/552335#Comment_552335

Bump.

Angela Murashov

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/533945#Comment_533945

I just happened to move the cursor over the scroll bar and noticed something was very very wrong. Still is, in every full Bible I've tried that happens to have any auto bookmarks near the middle.

I completed more testing with this and was finally able to reproduce it. This is a difficult issue to have clear reproduction steps for.

I will make a case for this bug for Development.

fgh

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/553701#Comment_553701

I completed more testing with this and was finally able to reproduce it. This is a difficult issue to have clear reproduction steps for.

I bet! Well done.[:)]